“Remember, the subject of cosmic war between symbolic representations of “Good” (god) and Evil (Satan) serves primarily to interpret and order very real human relationships — especially the reality of all-too human conflict — in supernatural form.”
The ancient Egyptian word for Egyptian simply means “human”. The Greek word for non-Greeks, “barbarian,” resembles the broken linguistic accents of those who do not speak Greece’s native tongue — since they speak unintelligibly, as do many foreigners not born in the United States, the Greeks call them barbaroi.
Yet this virtually universal practice of calling one’s own people human and “dehumanizing” others does not necessarily mean that people actually doubt or deny others’ humanness. However, some behaviors and actions go way beyond the pale of perceived differences when it comes to disrespecting another person’s rights based solely on ethnic, religious, gender, sexual, cultural characteristics. For example, the actions of Anthony Sowell, Ted Bundy, Adolf Hitler, Andrew Cunanan are examples where one might actually consider these individuals as “outside of human relatedness”, or “other humanness” because of their actions which actively sought to destroy and annihilate another non-threatening person. The act of treating one as an outsider by excluding them from a social group may be something considered a bit antisocial but far less aggressive, in fact, more passive-aggressive, because one doesn’t practice the same customs. This is something altogether entirely different and to which the term “the Satan” is often deployed when analyzing ancient writings of religious theology. Unfortunately, this phenomenon of “the Satan” also gave rise to acts of mass delusional persecution and extermination (genocide). It is closely bound to the psychic splitting of object relations theorized by countless psychoanalysts from Anna Freud to Melanie Klein to Jacques Lacan to Heinz Kohut and Donald Winnicott and to which is most often associated with childhood trauma.
The New Testament gospels almost never identify Satan with the Romans, but in fact, they were. The New Testament consistently associates Satan with Jesus’ Jewish enemies, primarily Judas Iscariot and the chief priests and scribes known as the Pharisees. By placing the story of Jesus in the context of cosmic war, the gospel writers expressed, in varying ways, their identification with the embattled minority of Jews who believed in Jesus, and their distress at what they saw as the apostasy of the majority of their fellow Jews in Jesus’ time, as well as in their own. Jesus’ followers did not invent the practice of demonizing enemies within their own group, although Christians, and Muslims after them, carried this practice further than their Jewish predecessors had taken it, and with enormous consequences.
Josephus, writing from his Roman retirement villa no doubt hoped not only to express his anguish but also to exonerate himself for collaborating with those who destroyed Jerusalem when he wrote;
“O most wretched city, what misery so great as this did you suffer from the Romans, when they came to purify you from your internecine hatred!”
Might not one consider this very sentiment toward the Targeted Individual suffering electronic targeted physical assaults and psychotronic torture? Where one day, at my local grocer’s lunch meat counter, I uncounted a former acquaintance “Joe”. I was not very kind to “Joe” because he was a close friend of a former abusive boyfriend of mine and to which I still perceived “Joe” as abusive as well. What would soon follow for me was electronic targeting and psychotronic torture. Was my “internecine hatred” the cause of my targeting? Or is the phenomenon of Group (Gang) Stalking with electronic targeted physical assaults and psychotronic torture something entirely different. Is it more likely that the government is targeting me and a small population of others it perceives as enemies who have been placed on a “watchdog list”? Not likely. It’s more likely, that similar to the development of “the Satan” in the Old Testament, the phenomenon developed out of inner-group conflict. The Satan of the Old Testament was frequently represented as a cultural foreigner to the local region or native population. As Elaine Pagels, author of the Origins of Satan, writing on her analyzes of the written works of the Bible states:
“The apostle Mark himself, like the Essenes, viewed the war movement essentially as a conflict within one “house” — as I read it, the house of Israel. Even the images that Mark invokes to characterize the majority — images of Satan, Beelzebub, and the devil — paradoxically express the intimacy of Mark’s relationship with the Jewish community as a whole, for, as we shall see, the figure of Satan, as it emerged over the centuries in Jewish tradition, is not a hostile power assailing Israel from without, but the source and representation of conflict within the community. “From the beginning, then, Israelite tradition defines “us” in ethnic, political, and religious terms as “the people of Israel,” or “the people of God,” as against “them” — the (other) nations (in Hebrew, ha goyim), the alien enemies of Israel, often characterized as inferior, morally depraved, even potentially accursed.” . . .
Pagels goes on further to tell us,
“Satan’s presence in stories could help account for unexpected obstacles or reversals of fortune. Hebrew storytellers often attribute misfortunes to human sin. Some, however, also invoke this supernatural character, the Satan, who, by God’s own order or permission, blocks or opposes human plans and desires. But this messenger is not necessarily malevolent. God sends him, like the angel of death, to perform a specific task, although one that human beings may not appreciate; as the literary scholar Neil Forsyth says of the Satan, “If the path is bad, an obstruction is good.” Thus, the Satan may simply have been sent by the Lord to protect a person from worse harm. The story of Balaam in the biblical book of Numbers, for example, tells of a man who decided to go where God had ordered him not to go. Balaam saddled his ass and set off, “but God’s anger was kindled because he went; and the angel of the Lord took his stand in the road as his Satan” [le-satan-lo] — that is, as his adversary, or his obstructor. This supernatural messenger remained invisible to Balaam, but the she-ass saw him and stopped in her tracks:
And the ass saw the angel of the Lord standing in the road, with a drawn sword in his hand; and the ass turned aside out of the road, and went into the field; and Balaam struck the ass, to turn her onto the road. Then the angel of the Lord stood in a narrow path between the vineyards, with a wall on each side. And when the ass saw the angel of the Lord, she pushed against the wall, so he struck her again (22:23–25).”
God is the Evil One and Satan is the Savior or the Christ
The Testimony of Truth and Hypostasis of the Archons or sometimes called the Reality of the Rulers are ancient Gnostic texts discovered at Nag Hammadi Library in 1945. This library consisted of various Gnostic texts that were stashed away and hidden probably with the purpose to protect and preserve them so they wouldn’t be lost, confiscated, or worse, destroyed. These books may have been known to father Ignasius, an early Catholic Church father. Although I’m not absolutely certain whether or not these two books were in fact known to him. However, what is known to me is there were various other Gnostic texts circling about during Ignasius’ time, of which the early Catholic father labeled “heretical” and/or “gnostic” and excluded them from what was compiled to what we now know today as the Bible.
The teachers of the Testimony of Truth convinced that Christ’s message is precisely the opposite of “the law” — that is, the law laid out in the Hebrew Bible — raises radical questions:
What is the light? And what is the darkness? And who is the one who created the world? And who is God? And who are the angels? … And what is the governance (of the world)? And why are some lame, and some blind, and some rich, and some poor, some powerful rulers and some not?
Approaching the Genesis story with questions like these, a teacher of the Testimony of Truth may discover that it reveals truth only when one reads it in reverse, recognizing that God is actually the villain, and the serpent the holy one! A teacher may point out to a student, for example, that in Genesis 2:17, God commands Adam not to eat from the fruit of the tree in the midst of Paradise, warning that “on that day that you shall eat of it, you shall die.” But the serpent tells Eve the opposite: “You will not die, for God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil” (3:4–5).Who, asks the Testimony, told the Truth? When Adam and Eve obeyed the serpent, “then the eyes of both were opened, and they knew that they were naked (3:7). They did not die “on that day,” as God had warned; instead, their eyes were opened to knowledge, as the serpent had promised. But when God realized what had happened, “he cursed the serpent, and called him ’devil’” (Gen. 3:14–15).Now that Adam had attained godlike knowledge, God decided to evict him from Paradise, “lest he reaches out his hand and eat of the tree of life and live forever” (Gen. 3:22), attaining eternal life along with knowledge.
What kind of God is this god? Surely, he has shown himself to be a malicious envier,” says the author of the Testimony. Not only is this god jealous of his own creation, but he is also ignorant and vindictive. And what of the serpent, whom God cursed and called “devil”? According to the Testimony of Truth, the serpent who led Adam and Eve to spiritual enlightenment is actually Christ, appearing in this disguise in Paradise to release Adam and Eve from “the error of the angels” — that is, error induced by malevolent supernatural “rulers,” who masquerade as God in this world.
This philosophical rendering may make absolute sense since, through the study of object relations in psychoanalysis, delusions of Satan are actually represented as marginalized, vulnerable, minority groups and to which Christ and his followers were members. And that God, the ruler of the Jewish Old Testament, would have been represented as the Pharisees, a member of an ancient Jewish sect distinguished by strict observance of the traditional and written law, and commonly held to have pretensions to superior sanctity.
We might go on further to refer to the work by Donald Capps who wrote for the journal Pastoral Psychology the article entitled, “God Has Been Diagnosed with Narcissistic Personality Disorder.” The abstract to this article reads:
“This article endorses the contention that God suffers from a mental disorder, but challenges J. Henry Jurgens’ diagnosis of bipolar disorder as reported in The Onion (“God diagnosed with bipolar disorder”, 2001) and proposes narcissistic personality disorder instead. It uses the diagnostic criteria for narcissistic personality disorder from The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders — DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC, 1994) and various biblical citations in support of this diagnosis. It rejects the idea that a major personality change is reflected in the New Testament and claims that God did not experience a major transformation of his narcissistic personality structure as described by Heinz Kohut (Forms and transformations of narcissism, in A. P. Morrison, Ed., Essential papers on narcissism, pp. 61–87, New York University Press, New York, 1966/1986). However, it concludes that God’s creativity accounts for the stability of his narcissistic personality structure and helps to explain his lack of empathy toward human beings.”
Remember, the subject of cosmic war between symbolic representations of “Good” (god) and Evil (Satan) serves primarily to interpret and order very real human relationships — especially the reality of all-too-human conflict — in supernatural form. In this light, we might view the bible as nothing more than DC Comic Book or Marvel Super Heroes’ interpretation of how abusive leadership powers inflict pain and suffering on marginalized, minority groups who are both vulnerable and powerless.
In yet another vein, ancient affiliates known as the “Eye of the King” discussed by Livius.org in Articles of Ancient History state the Greek researcher Herodotus of Halicarnassus suggests that the Median leader Astyages had several courtiers, one of them being the “eye of the king”. This is the first time this official, which is better known from the Achaemenid empire, is mentioned.
On Livius.org the following is written:
“Persian Eyes” were appointed by the king to inform him of what was going on in the empire. They supervised the payment of tribute, oversaw how rebellions were suppressed, and reported evils to the king. Inside their well-defined regions, they had more powers than the satraps. (According to the Athenian writer Xenophon, the Eyes also commanded armies to check satraps.) Even when the monarch was not present, people knew that he would be informed of their actions and anxieties.
The Greeks knew the office. In his comedy Acharnians (first staged in 425), the Athenian playwright Aristophanes puts an Eye on the stage; the actor must have worn a mask that was painted with one big eye so that he looked a bit like a cyclops. Almost a century later, Aristotle of Stagira was still impressed by the efficiency of the office:
“The pomp of Cambyses and Xerxes and Darius was ordered on a grand scale and touched the heights of majesty and magnificence. The king himself, they say, lived in Susa or Ecbatana, invisible to all, in a marvelous palace […]. Outside these the leaders and most eminent men were drawn up in order, some […] called “guards” and the “listening-watch”, so that the king himself […] might see everything and hear everything (Balcer, 1977).”
When the Athenians founded their empire in the early fifth century, they copied this institution, calling their inspectors episkopoi or “overseers”. This title may have been a word-play because this word sounds like the (probable) Persian name of the Eye: spasakaor “seer”. However, this is hypothetical.
The functions of theepiskopos and the Eye were broadly similar: every town in the Athenian empire was supervised by anepiskopos, who controlled the payment of the tributes, was supposed to prevent insurrections, and had to investigate evils and report them to the Athenian government. Usually, the episkoposwere chosen by the sovereign body in Athens, the people’s assembly. The similarities are remarkable.
It should be stressed, however, that every ruler uses officials like the Eyes to know what is happening. The names of theseinspectors may be different, but there are some primitive tasks that have to be executed anyway. For example, Charlemagne employed missi dominici.The Athenian government needed to send outinspectors like all rulers had to do. Nevertheless, because the job responsibilities of the Eyeand the episkoposare so very similar, we must seriously entertain the possibility that the Athenians copied a Persian function.”
Here we can imagine that modern-day equivalent of police officers, detectives, secret service men, central intelligent agents, and spies may fall into this category of what has historically been called “the Eye”, “the Satan” or “God” depending upon whichever perspective you agree with; the Old Testament or The Testimony of Truth.
And here we might ask again;
“What is the light? And what is the darkness? And who is the one who created the world? And who is God? And who are the angels? Who is Satan? ….And what is the governance (of the world)? And why are some lame, and some blind, and some rich, and some poor, some powerful rulers and some not?”
Pagels, Elaine. (1995). The Origins of Satan. New York. Random House.
To give an example of how a bureaucracy gives phenomenon like Group (Gang) Stalking with electronic targeting assault and psychotronic torture its staying power, let’s look at the social fall-out following phenomenon of mass random gun violence in Charleston, Virginia in 2015. The racial tensions in the United States have always been with us. But in recent years the pitch of these tensions had reached such a level it was clear the United States was on the emergence of something new; the denouncement of the southern institution known as the Confederacy.
Following the Charleston Virginia Church shooting of 2015, in which nine African Americans were killed during a church service, prompted the removal of southern Confederate statues. The killer, Dylann Roof, a 21-year-old white supremacist open fired during a Bible study service. Roof espoused racial hatred in both a website manifesto published before the shooting and a journal written from jail afterward.
Two years following these events the city of New Orleans, Louisiana removed its Confederate memorials. In 2017, a few months following the removal of Louisiana’s Confederate statues, the Unite the Right rally formed in Charlottesville, Virginia to protest the removal of its Robert E. Lee statue. It turned violent. As a result of these ongoing tensions, various mayors and governors in cities across the United States began the removal of Confederate statues in what the Roman Catholic Church might call a “mass defrocking”.Why?Because the way to sustain any persecution is by giving that institution staying power by giving it an institutional life; the life of white supremacy. One might seriously ponder what the hell is giving the Targeted Individual phenomenon its staying power?
Once inquisitions and persecutions come into existence, the tools used to stoke and manage those omnipresent embers of hatred, intolerance, and prejudice are by giving individuals with those very attributes and characteristics an institutional life and the capabilities to establish standard operating procedures (S.O.P.). This has been my understanding of the racial violence committed by white police officers against black men. I also understand this is sometimes witnessed as protection extended to police given by the governors and mayors following acts of excessive force and civil rights violations of black men. However, what I witnessed in the fall out of the George Floyd killing in 2020 was a manifestation of a similar type of male supremacy expressed by some black men that voiced the right of entitlement to commit violations against “other” solely on the basis of “Black Lives Matter.” We might even imagine and ponder future events. Events where blacks may form coalitions to victimize (even kill) whites in response to a flagrant demonstration of excessive force done by white police officers against black individuals. Certainly, this has been made manifest in the riots that ensued following the death of George Floyd and the victimization and destruction of white business owners’ property through looting. Hate has only begotten hate and good leaders know the way to stymie any institutional power interested in persecuting others is by taking away or diminishing its authority. Wasn’t that what J. Edgar Hoover finally had come to do when he finally mustered enough courage to confront the mafia during the early 20th century? Isn’t this why RICO laws were established? And isn’t this why Derek Chauvin is no longer a police officer?
Power sources can vary as one might imagine, as people have imagined, that the phenomenon is enmeshed in institutionalized forms of power and political rule. It also may be imagined that the phenomenon of Group (Gang) Stalking may be a professional criminal orchestration; a professional business venture carried out against a vulnerable population who haven’t the power to defend itself against the monster the phenomenon represents. The Panzerkardinal of the Holy Roman Catholic Church, who incidentally has also been called “God’s Rottweiler,” reverberates itself in tones emanating from a proverbial history bell.
When asked if I believed the removal of the Confederate statues across the United States should occur, my answer was “Yes. Most definitely.”The reason I felt this way was because to do otherwise would be to give institutional power to the seeds of evil made manifest, not only in men’s deeds but in their thoughts as well. In other words, if it didn’t occur, it would be like backing and endorsing not just white supremacy, but all forms of cultural supremacy; religious, racial, gender, sexual, or otherwise. Then, how is the phenomenon of the Targeted Individual and Group (Gang) Stalking being given its staying power?
In order to find out the answer to this question one must uncover the following:
Who is enforcing the phenomenon’s laws and by what means is it administering punishments with a certain amount of uniformity and regularity? There must be a well-defined process (S.O.P) for conducting and exacting the torture being given.
What administrative authority has established the laws that are giving the institution of Group (Gang) Stalking with electronic targeted physical assaults and psychotronic torture the staying power it needs to continue its operations? Procedures (S.O.P.) exist for record-keeping, for retrieving information, compiling data, and ensuring the day-to-day operations for not only corporations but for administrative democracies but for research projects and medical monitoring. Under whose authority are these actions being directed?
Who make up the necessary trained staff to administer the torture and who are the individuals “competent” enough to be trusted with carrying out the administrative goals of the established coalition? All businesses, corporations, administrative bureaucracies, and governments, research groups, as well as organized criminal syndicates, need trusted and trained staff to invest power in, in order for the goals of the coalition to be meet. Of who is the coalition comprised?
What is their method of communication? There must be some ability to send messages across significant distances and keep records of communications such as texts, emails, faxes, phone calls, financial ledgers, etc. as well as some capacity to restrict the communications of others. The primary, number one characteristic of all businesses, corporations, administrative bureaus in government, research projects as well as in organized crime is a means to communicate information with one another. How do they communicate?
Where does their power derive from? This power can be political, religious, ethnic, business corporate entity, those with wealth, academic, cultural, etc., even networked criminal syndicates have a certain amount of established and ongoing staying power. How long did El Chapo run his business operations? How long were doctors in the early part of the 20th century allowed unethical, inhumane, and unorthodox torture of prison populations for the purpose of “research”? A well-established practice in the United States well before the Nazis took over Germany during World War II and where similar forms of torture continued to occur at Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp.
On what basis and philosophical argument do they support their actions are in fact the right ones and not in violation of U.S. Constitutional Laws?An important factor to any act of supremacy is the need to always be right even in the face of philosophical arguments that say otherwise.
One might reach a conclusion as to the reason for such hate and intolerance is securely nestled in the institutions that make and create wars. Institutions that promote the continuation of hate, violence, intolerance, and bigotry; the militarized industrial complex. In fact, we might ask ourselves, “If we lived in a world where acts of violent aggression, hatred, intolerance, bigotry, and the like, were not given institutional staying power, might our world be just as violent?”
This article makes a point to make a literary comparison of the afflictions suffered by Job in the Bible and the phenomenon of electronic targeted assaults and psychotronic torture, and that both are of a similar nature. This article also makes a point to define and diagnose the “God” of these assaults with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) as outline by the DSM-IV. I borrow on the work of Donald Capps in a journal article he wrote for Pastoral Psychology, as well as psychoanalysts who have contributed to psychoanalytic theory. Authors like Heinz Kohut, Herbert Rosenfeld, Nancy Chodorow, and Melanie Klein.
In the Book of Job, after Job, a faithful and upright individual suffers losses of livestock, the death of his 10 children by marauding men, followed by an affliction of open sores all over his body (Behcet’s Disease), he wants to confront God face-to-face, and not through intercessory prayer either. He wants to talk to him directly and ask why he is being punished? For Job inquires, “Why have you made me your target?”(Job 7:20) Job finds God’s elusive nature a problem. The job cannot confront God face-to-face because he is “God.” It isn’t until God presents himself to Job in form of a whirlwind does Job inquires of God’s cruelty.
What the reader/listener is aware, and Job himself is not, is that “God” and “Satan” have entered a GAME. After roaming about the Earth and walking around in it, Satan enters the court of God. God wants to know if he has noticed his faithful follower Job in which Satan replies that he had. Satan challenges God by saying the only reason he is so faithful is that God has given him everything; abundant and plentiful livestock, property, financial wealth, 10 children. Satan tells God if he strikes out his hand, Job wouldn’t be so faithful. God, refusing to hurt his faithful follower himself, offers Job to Satan and says do with him as you wish but do not harm him. Two players, God and Satan, in a finite game with the goal to see what type of rational or irrational choices will be made by the game piece called Job. Remember the movie Trading Places with Eddie Murphy and Dan Aykroyd?
A strategic attack is placed upon Job’s blessings: his livestock is struck dead, all 10 children murdered, and Job is afflicted with open, painful sores all over his body. All this which God allows because he believes Job cannot be turned against him in the wager he has made with Satan.
What of God’s invisibility? God cannot be reached by Job directly in the physical sense because of God’s nature. In fact, God instead, God presents himself to Job as the superior controlling player in the game and manifests himself as a whirlwind in which he speaks to Job directly in the form of a whirlwind for five chapters. It is during these conversations we get a glimpse of a controlling, unempathetic, sadistically cruel God. The diagnosis by Donald Capp in Pastoral Psychology has been narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) and he has proven God has met all nine criteria in various books of the Old Testament including the Book of Job. In fact, God belittles Job’s intelligence and inferior knowledge through a series of rhetorical questions, for it is God who is clearly the superior, all-knowing deity. And to further add insult to injury, God basically says to Job how dare you question my justice? I am the superior person in this arrangement and not YOU! How dare YOU pronounce me wicked so that YOU may be right? He says Job’s claims are recklessly bold and insolent. This is the typical response we expect to get from a person with NPD, for God is guilty as hell for causing Job’s pain and suffering but eludes being blamed for it by gaslighting his victim.
What’s more, is God’s showy entrance into the world of living human beings. He chooses, not as a disguise the shape of mortal man or “a messenger from God” with which to identify with Job in human form, but he appears to Job as a showy whirlwind. What a grand entrance for this “superior being”! He displays a similarly consistent style of showmanship in Exodus when he exacts the ten (10) plagues against Egypt. What a performance of perfectly destructive showmanship; flies, gnats, frogs, locusts, and inflicting man and beast with boils all over their bodies. He even rains down sulfur and fire on the city of Sodom and Gomorrah in the Bible story found in Genesis [Gen. 19:23–24]. But does God ever take on responsibilities like creating economic infrastructure, supporting foreign trade, providing opportunities for employment, the development of aqueducts, and the building of cities, providing social services for the poor, sick, and the disabled? All these aspects are consistent with exceptional statesmanship, the work and hard grit of “lowly humans” seem to be countered by fierce, military, pyrotechnics. In fact, God doesn’t do any of the things attributed to the hard work and perseverance of human populations, although he does claim to have given the people who create these accomplishments the “gifts” and “talents” to do so. Of all of God’s skills, showmanship is surely one of them, however, it appears he is lacking when it comes to a supportive leadership role, characteristics we typically attribute to traits like honesty, integrity, intrepidness, hard work, and perseverance of adversity to the human race. And not God! At least as far as the Book of Job is concerned. We could also discuss his leadership skills when he hand-selected Moses and guided him through the desert for 40 years, where, under God’s navigation and leadership, made them wander like nomads for 40 years! Wandering nomads may very well have walked in circles during their 255-mile trek to the promised land. Exceptional skills of statesmanship belong to excellent leaders which God is clearly not. At least when it comes to the Book of Job.
Destructive Showmanship and Destructive Narcissistic Defense Function of NPD; A review of Herbert Rosenfeld’s work
We can make connections and comparisons to the aspect of destructive showmanship of a militarized defensive posture of God with his earthquakes and the pyrotechnics of raining fire and brimstone from the sky and make a connection to the presence of infantile psychic destructive forces within the construct of narcissistic personality disorder where the purpose for an exhibition of power is to pervert and block growth and development as well as providing an attacking defensive function against victims, where devaluing and depreciating the subject to the point of rendering them “useless” and “worthless” (Rosenfeld, 1971) can be made in both the plight of Job, the plight of the Jewish Holocaust, and the plight of the Targeted Individual suffering electronic targeted assaults and psychotronic torture.
As I have stated, I can make a direct connection and comparison between this analysis of the Book of Job, right-wing radical Republican liberals (Mayer, 2016), and the analysis Group (Gang) Stalking with electronic targeted physical assaults and psychotronic torture which are obvious acts of destructive showmanship and not supportive statesmanship.
In another bulleted point, God said to Moses, “Go into Pharaoh, for I have hardened his heart and the heart of his servants, that I may show these signs of mine among them, and that you may tell in the hearing of your son and of your son’s son how I have made sport of the Egyptians and what signs I have done among them; that you may know that I am the Lord” (Exod. 10:1–2). The whole idea is to draw attention to himself through a few signs that make sport of the Egyptians, making them look rather foolish. Is this not what game theory has taught us about warfare and to which reveals to us the purpose of Group (Gang) Stalking with electronic targeted physical assaults and psychotronic torture. That it is nothing more than a demonstration of how “stupid,” “weak,” “childish,” “foolish” the victim is? A flashy array of showmanship utilizing hi-tech advanced technology and the smoke and mirrors of a seduction utilizing implanted software on victim’s computer devices that “hack into” the private lives of the victims as well as implanted biological devices that “hack into” the victim’s brains? Creating disruption, distraction, denial of rights, and the illusion of an “omnipotent and powerful God” in order to elicit in the victim feelings of “powerlessness,” “inferiority,” and “fear” against a clearly “superior power.” And if we consider the aspect of victim selection in populations suffering malevolent forms of NPD, we see victims tend to be weaker, vulnerable, accessible targeted populations for the narcissist.
Another point to make is this. Although the readers/listeners to the Book of Job are made aware of the wager between God and Satan, Job, himself, is not. As a result of this lack of privileged information, Job becomes confused as to the reason for his punishments. God and Satan both know Job is blameless, upright, and faithful. The dilemma in Job’s situation is in the folly of trying to understand “God’s ways” when certain “human people” (non-ecclesiastical) are not privileged “to know the mind of God.” Here we might make a literary comparison to the work of Goethe in his play Faust. What follows for Job is confusion, as well as a deception by the very God he loves and trusts. Every good detective knows a criminal will lie through his teeth. That is why detectives are taught techniques in uncovering the lies told by criminal agents. But Job does not shrink in the face of a larger-than-life dictator and says, “Look! I have become of little account. What shall I reply to you?” In other words, I’ve clearly been reduced to a 10th of my worth, you clearly took away from me what you wanted, demonstrating to me you clearly hold the superior position. What am I to say to you?
With regard to Group (Gang) Stalking as the reason for its manifestation is for its purpose in GAME PLAY, then the reason I contend it has been instituted upon the victim is because that the victim has achieved Nash’s Equilibrium in his/her lifestyle. And Nash’s Equilibrium states that “… Nash equilibrium is a decision-making theorem within the game theory that states a player can achieve the desired outcome by not deviating from their initial strategy.” So, if a player has no incentive to make a change, or consider an alternate choice in his/her lifestyle, then, how is one to illicit a change? And the answer to that question, as was Satan’s hoped-for outcome in the Book of Job, is to elicit a change in the victim’s choices by inflicting a painful and tormenting, outside opposing force, upon the victim, which takes the form of electronic targeted physical and psychotronic assaults in Targeted Populations, or in Job’s case, inflicting him with catastrophic loses and painful open sores. And the man who confronted me over Quora.com while I was discussing my experience as a Targeted Individual stated it was “because I couldn’t imagine anything better for myself.” This is in line with Satan’s response to God, “Job is only faithful to you because you give him everything!” It would seem that prosperity and wealth is the difference that separates the classes. And I contend the reason for my targeting.
The biggest development in the advancement of Job’s position would have been in the revelation that what is being done to him is nothing more than a GAME! A game bought about because Job is living in prosperity under the protection and benevolence of God. But because Job is not privileged to the information that God and Satan are only playing a game, he remains preoccupied with his suffering and punishments, endlessly wondering what he has done wrong to displease God. The fault, as is the faultline in the phenomenon of Group (Gang) Stalked Targeted Individual suffering electronic targeted physical assaults and psychotronic torture, can be viewed as when Job’s friends come to assist him, attempting to explain to Job with limited understanding and knowledge regarding “God’s ways”. The unavailable information denied them is in the fact that God and Satan are, in fact, at the craps table at Trump’s casino playing a GAME with Job’s very life and welfare just to see “what Job will do next.” The unavailable knowledge is that it is all a GAME to transform Job and darken his faith against God! And here we might ponder the fact of whether or not the phenomenon of the Targeted Individual suffering electronic targeted physical assaults and psychotronic torture might not be a purposefully crafted design, an experiment if you will, using hi-tech advances (the militarized defensive posture akin to earthquakes and fiery pyrotechnics of the Old Testament) to transform the subject’s [a Job substitute] “own narcissism” (Kohut, 1966/1986).
Kohut noted that like all complex human activities, creativity involves the whole personality, and thus a wide range of psychological structures and drives. God clearly is a creative being and creativity is a much needed attribute in transforming destructive narcissistic infantile psychic forces into more productive modes of socialized behavior. He had created many things. “But clearly, more than just the narcissistic energies are involved … But narcissism plays a key role in the creative activity of the individual “as a spur, driving him toward fame and acclaim” and which we could certainly say of God. Another narcissistic aspect of creativity is the “idealizing libido” which manifest itself in one’s own passionate involvement in creative work. The analogy between this involvement and the mother’s love for her unborn fetus and newborn baby is often invoked, but Kohut believes that “the creative person’s relationship to his work has less in common with the expanded narcissism of motherhood than with the still restricted narcissism of early childhood” (p. 75). In fact, “the personality of many unusually creative individuals is more childlike than maternal,” and “the experiments of some of the great in science impress the observer with their almost childlike freshness and simplicity” (p. 75) [Capps, 2009].”
Capps goes on to further say,
“Thus, whether in art or in science, the creative individual “is less psychologically separated from his surroundings than the noncreative one; the I-you barrier is not as clearly defined,” and the “intensity of the creative person’s awareness of the relevant aspects of his surroundings is akin to the detailed self-perceptions of the schizoid and the childlike: it is nearer to a child’s relationship to his excretions or to some schizophrenics’ experiences of their body, than to a healthy mother’s feeling for her newborn child” (p. 75). In this connection, Kohut cites the work of Phyllis Greenacre and Kurt R. Eissler, noting that “their findings are consistent with the proposition that the artist invests his work with a specific form of narcissistic libido” (p. 76). The very fact that creative people “tend to alternated during periods of productivity between phases when they think extremely highly of their work and phases when they are convinced that it has no value, is a sure indication that the work is connected with a form of narcissistic libido” (p. 77). Thus, consistent with Freud’s view that the narcissistic drives originate in the child’s desire to recover the sense of perfection that be originally enjoyed, Kohut concludes:
Creative artists, and scientists, may be attached to their work with the intensity of an addiction, and they try to control and shape it with forces and for purposes which belong to a narcissistically experienced world. They are attempting to re-create a perfection which formerly was directly and attribute of their own; during the act of creation, however, they do not relate to their work in the give-and-take mutuality which characterizes object-love. (p. 77) [Capps, 2009]”
With regard to the limited information available to victims of Group (Gang) Stalking with electronic targeted physical assaults and psychotronic torture, a.k.a. The Targeted Individual, the confusion to their plight is further compounded by the fact that disinformation regarding the phenomenon gets passed around the internet. In my experience with Group (Gang) Stalking with electronic targeted physical assaults and psychotronic torture, as an umbrella term assigned to it that does not accurately categorize it, it is most likely being carried out by someone who is suffering from NPD or perhaps some other type of personality disorder such as schizoid personality disorder in combination with a clustering of the Dark Tetrad traits (sadism, Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy). If we consider Capps’ comment regarding the personality type of God in his analysis,
“One could just as well argue that God suffers from schizoid personality disorder, whose essential feature is “a pervasive pattern of detachment from social relationships and a restricted range of expression of emotions in interpersonal settings (DSM-IV).” Such persons often seem indifferent to the approval or criticism of others and do not appear to be bothered by what others may think of them. We can easily imagine that such a person might help someone overcome colon cancer and then subsequently create a flood in which this person perishes, and does not have much feeling about either of these occurrences or even consider that they might appear contradictory (Capps, 2009).”
To further illustrate aspects of schizoid personality disorder (SPD), I will gather from my own personal experience as a rape victim. Men who rape women may very well have suffer from SPD. SPD is at the heart of abnormal object relations based on Kleinian theory (Jacobs, 2007). As known rapists operating in the communities are split against their maternal love object (Palmer, 2011). As a result, men who rape can demonstrate a form of “detachment from social relationships,” especially concerning women through repetitive sexual assaults. Men of this type often have a restricted range of expression or emotions which is also termed “shallow effect” during consensual intercourse. This restricted range of expression and/or emotions may, at times, seem to be connected with drug and alcohol abuse but because the perpetrator’s history of violence is most likely due to SPD. During sessions of consensual sex, men who rape may display shallow effect which is characterized by a lack in depth of emotional feeling in combination with mechanistic robot-like movement, but in scenarios of forceable sexual assault, these men express themselves, although considered abnormal and antisocial behavior, with a range of almost “normal” emotional content and movement consistent with normal heterosexual passion.
However, in its discussion of the nine criteria required for narcissistic personality disorder, the DSM-IV notes that often implicit in their inflated judgements concerning their own accomplishments is an underestimation or devaluation of the contributions of others (criterion 1); that they may ruminate about “long overdue” admiration and privilege and compare themselves favorably with famous or privileged people (criterion 2); that their own self-esteem is enhanced by the idealized value they assign to those with whom they associate (criterion 3); that their self-esteem is usually very fragile and they therefore fish for compliments, expect their arrival to be greeted with great fanfare, and are astonished if others do not covet their possessions (criterion 4); that they expect to be catered to and are puzzled or furious when this does not happen, assume that they do not have to wait in line, consider their priorities to be so important that others should defer to them, and get irritated when others fail to assist in their very important work (criterion 5); that they expect to be given whatever they want or feel they need, no matter what it might mean to others, and form friendships or romantic relationships only if the other person seems likely to advance their purposes or otherwise enhance their self-esteem (criterion 6); that they assume that others are totally concerned about their welfare, discuss their own concerns in inappropriate and lengthy detail while failing to recognize that others have feelings and needs, and treat those who talk about their own problems and concerns with impatience and contempt (criterion 7); that they begrudge others their successes or possessions, feeling that they better deserve those achievements, admiration, or privileges, and devalue the contributions of others, particularly when those individuals have received acknowledgement or praise for their accomplishments (criterion 8); and that they tend to make their disdain for others very apparent, such as by complaining about a clumsy waiter’s “stupidity” or concluding a medical evaluation with a condescending evaluation of the physician (criterion 9).
And as Donald Capps has carefully illustrated for us, God in the Old Testament meets the nine criteria for NPD. In addition, another important point I would like to include is the information that aspects of Group (Gang) Stalking with electronic targeted physical assault and psychotronic torture, at least as I have experienced the, can be analyzed in the same manner, as it presents a similar dilemma in, not only game theory, but also in Job’s dilemma in the Bible Book of Job in the Old Testament. And the person who is at the root of this phenomenon clearly demonstrates he is in full possession of a “God Complex” better known as a personality disorder and that this person values his identity because he carefully conceals it from exposure much like God who calls himself “I AM WHO I AM.” When prompted by Moses to reveal his name, God said; “At this God said to Moses: “I SHALL PROVE TO BE WHAT I SHALL PROVE TO BE.” And he added: “This is what you are to say to the sons of Israel, “I SHALL PROVE TO BE” has sent me to YOU [Exodus 3:14].” Some translations use the phrase “I AM WHO I AM.”
Let’s consider the aspect reflected in the Book of Job when God allowed himself to be drawn into a wager with Satan and this fact evidences God’s rather fragile self-esteem. “A person with a secure sense of self-esteem would not worry much as to whether someone was loyal to him. He would accept this loyalty as a given and appreciate it for what it represented and helped him to accomplish (Capps, 2009).” This ties into the faultlines and fragilities of masculinity Nancy Chodorow has theorized about in Individualizing Gender and Sexuality: Theory and Practice. Men who are not secure in their identity will sometimes fall victim to acts of aggression and violence (Barna, 2021). Nancy Chodorow writes,
“Humiliation, specifically, is especially a male-male — originally father-son — affair. In the normal developmental course of events, much hinges on how a boy relates to his father and turns into a man — the delicate negotiation of this transformation, of identification, of how to replace or join without bringing on retaliation, castration, or humiliation. All of these, in turn, depend partly on a father’s own sense of confident masculinity and selfhood. … (Chodorow, 2012, pp. 131).”
“In addition, the fact God entered into this wager demonstrates a clear lack of empathy and is a demonstration that he is either unwilling or incapable to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others (Capps, 2009).” The fact that God would place Job in the direct line of a firestorm from an evil malevolence clearly speaks of how much he truly cared about Job and Job’s suffering. “Even when he appeared to Job in the whirlwind, he did not ask Job how he was feeling, much less apologize to Job for putting him through his awful ordeal. Instead, he told Job that God did not know what he was talking about, thus intimating that this man who had been so faithful to him was not very intelligent (an unintended irony?). This attack on Job’s intelligence had its desired effect because when God stopped to catch his breath, Job responded that he was of a little account and we would speak no more [Job 40:3–4] (Capps, 2009).”
If we consider a research article from Psychiatry Research published in 2018 and completed to assess the gender differences in populations with NPD, it states:
“Although this disorder is estimated to affect 7.7% of males and 4.8% of females in the general population (Stinson et al., 2008) and is associated with substantial functional impairment and psychosocial disability (Stinson et al., 2008), it remains one of the least studied personality disorders (Caligor et al., 2015) [Hoertel, Peyre, Lavaud, Blanco, Guerin-Langlois, Rene, Schuster, Lemogne, Deloreme & Limosin, 2018].”
If we make a comparison to borderline personality disorder (BPD) and the gender distributions within populations of BPD, and consider the criterion for its diagnosis, we come to discover that it is far less likely that God or the person responsible for the electronic targeted physical assault and psychotronic torture of Targeted Individuals is a female (Silberschmidt, Lee, Sanarini & Schulz, 2015).
To further illustrate the argument for God’s NPD in the Book of Job, one might think that when Job said he would speak no more, it would have ended the matter, but God would not let Job off the hook quite that easily. Instead, he demanded that Job speak by responding to the questions that God was putting to him. He told Job to “gird up his loins like a man,” for “I will question YOU, and you declare TO ME,” adding, “Will you even put me in the wrong? Will you condemn me that you may be justified?” [40: 7–8]. It’s hard to imagine a more unfeeling attack on a man who is struggling just to keep alive, especially when we consider that God entered into the wager with Satan merely to prove that there are lots of people who admire God for who he is and not merely for what he does for them. An impartial reader of Job would probably conclude that Job’s response to the effects of the wager proved Satan’s point, that, in effect, God knew that Job’s reaction to what had happened to him would have forced God to concede that he had lost the bet with Satan. Perhaps this was why he demeaned Job, for a narcissist does not take kindly to being proven wrong.
What’s more, is in knowing the Book of Job’s purpose is to produce an effect/affect in the reader/listener rather than to communicate a literal idea. How is the reader made to feel upon learning that God and Satan are playing a game with Job’s life? As a faithful follower and diligent servant to his Lord and Master, a valued follower to God, in return what is God’s reward for such loyalty? Job is thrust into a GAME with Satan and God who will toy with his welfare; his emotions, his life (health), his faith, and his financial well-being. And, in return for all this suffering placed upon a blameless follower, for the purpose of a defensive posture supporting God’s very male ego, God blatantly demeans Job with a bullying approach condemning him for audaciously “questioning His justice.”
Another bulleted point is in the very similar way of how God conceals his identity and the perpetrators’ to electronic targeted assault and psychotronic torture also hide their identity from their victims. Capps noted, “God has a grandiose sense of self-importance and believes that he doesn’t have to have a name assigned to himself. He states, “I AM WHO I AM” which is an indication of such grandiosity. Whereas other deities had names suggesting that they were the gods of the people residing in a given locale, God took a name that not only drew attention to himself but also manifested the sort of grandiosity of which narcissists are famous, for he says, in effect, that a person as important as he does not have to be identified: “Who I am is who I am [Capps, 2009).”
Can we not say this as well for electronic targeted physical assaults and psychotronic torture and the plight of the Targeted Individual? Alternately, we hear the phrase spoken, “It is what it is.” This gives the speaker a convenient exit towards an excuse not to take responsibility for issues when there is clearly a need for corrective actions. I have heard abusers speak this phrase in order to elude the work of recovery. If an impoverished child falls ill with HIV because his/her mother is a prostitute who has acquired full-blown AIDS, certainly we wouldn’t let that child perish? Would we? Clearly, this is not what Americans stand for. We would not allow that child to perish without proper medicine just because of the inequities of a misguided parent. No, we would not. Neither would we seek to further punish that child for belonging to the lower classes. We would provide supportive statesmanship and social welfare benefits (Democratic statesmanship). Perhaps even provide improved educational opportunities in learning. This type of statesmanship clearly deviates from right-wing radical liberal Republicans who want to do what they want to do and the right-wing radical liberal Republican groups that form under the guidance of the Koch brothers. What’s more, is we could make similar comparisons to right-wing radical liberal groups that gathered at Charlottesville Virginia in 2017. Such events as the Unite the Right Rally where various white supremacy groups rooted white Klan ideology, alt-right, neo-Confederates, neo-fascists, white nationalists, neo-Nazi, Klansman, and various right-wing militias groups gathered in protest.
I propose, that just like the Book of Job, the purpose of electronic targeted physical assault and psychotronic torture is to illicit an effect/affect in the reader/listener. The purpose of electronic targeted physical assault and psychotronic torture is to illicit a feeling/emotion (fear/agitation), a response (verbal aggression/silence), some type of action/behavior (inaction/action/stay-at-home/ leave the house) and/or induce alternate states of consciousness (such as sedation or stimulation/inducing dream-like states through the use of new technologies of eSTIM as seen in Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) research) [Khan, 2016]. We can compare this to reports of random acts of gun violence in people who claimed they were being electronically targeted. To say, that the people claiming group (gang)stalking with electronic targeted assaults or psychotronic torture were “mentally ill” does the investigation an injustice because of one simple overlooked element; GAME THEORY. Game Theory can illuminate for us the rational choices made by characters in texts ranging from the Bible to Joseph Heller’s Catch-22 as well as in the analysis of irrational choices made by men in random acts of gun violence. For this reason, we can explicate strategic questions in law, history, and philosophy from Game Theory.
They claim the “mental illness” of the victim suffering electronic targeted physical assault and psychotronic torture is the reason, yet I will clearly demonstrate, point for point, how the perpetrators of such violence are just as mentally ill. So that the question becomes, Is it me?Or is it them?Am I the “problem?”Or are the perpetrators the problem? Because what it sounds like to me, is that phenomenon of the Targeted Individual, there appear to be two opposing groups of people and one of them is more mentally ill than the other in trying to annihilate them through clandestine electronic targeted physical assaults and psychotronic torture!
The comparison made between the Book of Job (Job’s dilemma) to the content narrative of electronic targeted physical assaults and psychotronic torture of the Targeted Individual and the likelihood that person carrying out these destructive attacks possess NPD or some similar type of personality disorder can be summed up as follows:
(1) God’s grandiose sense of self-importance in exaggerating his superiority. He in fact refuses to identify himself with a name saying, “I AM WHO I AM” (Exodus 3:14). Similarly, we see the perpetrator to electronic targeted physical assaults and psychotronic torture pre-occupied with similar refusal to divulge their identity as can be supported through the empirical evidence of invisible assaults against human populations in which the perpetrator carefully conceals their identity similar to ransomware attacks. If we consider the aspects of prosperity and wealth as characteristics that separate the classes, we can contend the reason for such game play in electronic targeting, as seen in ransomware attacks, is in the purpose to diminish the other while acquiring some of that very prosperity for God himself.
(2) God seems to be preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited power and brilliance. God has repeatedly demonstrated a tendency towards destructive showmanship causing earthquakes and raining fire and brimstone from the sky and causing various plagues. Similarly, we see the perpetrator to electronic targeted physical assaults and psychotronic torture pre-occupied with similar fantasies of unlimited power and brilliance. In showy displays that make their targets look foolish and stupid as is witnessed in people who carry out acts of bullying and ransomware attacks. Some victims of ransomware attacks, silently pay off those who victimize them out of embarrassment.
(3) God believes himself to be “special” and deserving of “special treatment” because he uniquely identifies with “special people of high-status” or “privileged institutions.” This was demonstrated in the book of Exodus 3:11–13 when God only chooses the tribe known as the Levites because they were considered “special” with special talents and skills and to which all other tribes were not considered. As a result, only the tribe of Levite was selected as “God’s special people.” I did not mention this in my paper, but I’m mentioning it now. This is a reference to a form of supremacy (white Klan supremacy) as well as its connection to the concealment of information as demonstrated in the Book of Job, in where Job was not privileged to the knowledge that Satan and God were engaged in a game using Job as a playing piece. Institutions like the CIA and the NSA do not make certain information publicly known. As a result, certain individuals are only allowed access to privileged information. Likewise, high-profile criminal cases may also conceal information from the public to protect the integrity of the investigation and certainly, criminal conspiracy and acts of organized crime carry out similar acts of concealment. By reducing the Targeted Individual to a shadow of his/her former self, the perpetrator can appear to be much more powerful.
(4) God is interpersonally exploitative. As a result, God is well versed in Game Theory. In fact, Satan is too! Written centuries before the writings of John Nash and Heinz Kohut, the Old Testament Book of Job incorporated theories rooted in Nash’s Equilibrium and Kohut’s Forms and Transformation of Narcissism. Certainly, Satan’s purpose was to transform Job’s narcissism by reducing him to a 10th of his former worth, thereby forcing him to make an alternate choice which was to turn his will against God. In the content narrative of Group (Gang) Stalking, people who report being targeted with electronic physical assault and psychotronic torture have said they “undergo a lifestyle change.” Some suggest the reason for their targeting is to move them into therapy groups where they may receive more social service support and financial grants.
(5) God possesses a sense of entitlement and unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations. When Job was enduring his suffering, God expected him to continue to be loyal and faithful even in the face of these terrible losses. In fact, God expected this of Job. There is no suggestion or implication of reciprocity in the fact that God must answer your prayers if you’re a faithful follower. Likewise, there is a similar pattern occurring with the Targeted Individual. In such cases, a person demonstrating forms of infantile anxieties are exacting punishments against a population of people for what appears to be assuaging the narcissism of the perpetrator. By utilizing advances in technology, the perpetrator creates for himself a counter-phobic object, a device used in a defensive posture against what may very well be phantasmagorical fears (Winnicott, 1971). For what does the Targeted Individual receive in return for his suffering? At least God, at the end of the Book of Job, restored Job’s health, gave him more children, and multiplied his financial status. It is as if the Targeted Individual is being used as a scapegoat (container) for the anger someone else’s feels about his unsolved problems.
(6) God lacks empathy and is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others. That God would enter into a wager with Satan over Job is evidence of his lack of empathy. The fact that God would place Job in the direct line of a firestorm from an evil malevolence clearly speaks of how much he truly cared about Job and Job’s suffering. In fact, God plans his entrances in such a way that they clearly place the other at a distinct disadvantage, leading them to confess to their deficiencies, insecurities, and insignificances. He appears to Moses as a burning bush that literally could lick his ass and burn it with fire. In the Book of Job, he appears as a whirlwind, perhaps a dirt devil that might increase in intensity literally throwing him yards away and killing him. We see something similar with electronic targeted physical assaults and psychotronic torture. The subjects suffering such torture are made to feel insignificant, inferior, and weak.
Here I listed at least six (6) of the nine criteria to make an official diagnosis of NPD. You need to only confirm at least five (5) for a formal diagnosis.
American Psychiatric Association (1994). The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders — DSM-IV. Washington, DC; Author.
Jacobs, Amber. (2007). On Matricide: Myth, Psychoanalysis, and the Law of the Mother. New York. Columbia University Press. In this book, Jacobs considers a myth found in ancient Greek tragedies written by Aeschylus and draws on Kleinian object relations theory.
Khan, Amreen. New DARPA Program Aims To Create Channel Between Human Brain and Modern Electronics. DefenseWorld.Net. Published January 20, 2016. Retrieved online October 3, 2021.
Pollard, Cynthia (1997). Narcissism: From Kohut ot CAT. Reformulation, ACAT News Winter, p.x. The important contribution to this article, and please defer to ROSENFELD and his representative Kleinian view of narcissism, where he outlines seven (7) observed destructive forces that operate to pervert power and block growth and development. These are defensive functions that also provide an attacking function.https://www.acat.me.uk/reformulation.php?issue_id=36&article_id=376
Rosenfeld, Herbert (1971). A clinical approach to the psychoanalytic theory of the life and death instincts: An investigation into the aggressive aspects of narcissism. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 52, 169–178.
The New World Translation of the Holy Scripture. (1984). Brooklyn, NY. Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. Original copyrights 1961 & 1981.
Silberschmidt, Amy; Lee, Susanne, PhD; Zanarini, MD; and Schulz, Charles S., MD. Gender Differences in Borderline Personality Disorder: Results from a multinational clinical trial sample. Journal of Personality Disorders. Vol. 29, №6 (December 2015). Please note gender differences in BPD populations tend to be comprised of women at a rate of 75% or higher.
SparksNotes.com. Bible: The Old Testament (Job). Section 11. Retrieved online October 2, 2021.
Winnicott, D.W. (1971) The use of the object and relating through identifications. In Playing and Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1980.
ADDITIONAL SOURCES IMPORTANT TO THIS ARTICLE BUT NOT CITED:
Brams, Steven J. (2011). Game theory and the humanities: bridging two worlds. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press. The author shows how game theory can illuminate the rational choices made by characters in texts ranging from the Bible to Joseph Heller’s Catch-22 and can explicate strategic questions in law, history, and philosophy.
Castaneda, J. (2005). The jury’s dilemma: playing God in the search for justice: solving the problems lurking in America’s courtrooms. Defense Counsel Journal, 72(4), 387–. “…This article explores the jury’s dilemma by plunging into the historical and present application of the jury’s purpose in criminal trials …” I propose it may be of informative interest, not in light of criminal trials, but in the aspects of vigilante justice.
Experiencing stress and aggravation due to the electronic targeting of my electronic devices such as my cell phone and computers because someone doesn’t understand boundary violations and the privacy of others is an understatement. The solution that I’ve been provided with is “get rid of your cell phone and your social media accounts” by family members. This is the posed solution that will “solve all my problems”, in my opinion, is not a solution at all when people have the right to own cell phones and express their voice and opinion over social media/blogs. The fact my perpetrators demonstrate no sense of fear or concern for their actions, actions that may be prosecutable by the government, suggests two things to me. One, they possess no fear because they are psychopaths. And two, they assumed I won’t go to the authorities because I’m too stupid and nobody would miss me.
The following is a timeline of events with regard to my cell phone history. I frequently wipe my phone because I experience the painful side effects of electromagnetic frequency field targeting in my living environment as targeted electronic physical assaults and psychotronic torture to my head bombard my peaceful living arrangements. Yesterday my timeline was as follows:
Sept. 21,2021 (early-mid afternoon) — wiped my phone and shut it down
Sept. 21,2021 10:00PM– turned on phone. My cell phone automatically dialed an “unknown” number even before my cell phone main (desktop) screen image appeared on screen.
Sept. 21,2021 10:38 PM– I personally sent a text message to my cell phone provider’s access portal regarding “data service” availability
Sept. 22, 2021 10:00AM– The following morning, I turned on my cell phone again by plugging it in because my battery went dead. Cellphone, again, automatically dials out to an “unknown number” as a signal to who? My cell phone provider that my phone was “up” and operating again. I make it a point to turn off “military time” readings over my cell phone. After my cell phone calls the “unknown number” my time stamps convert to military time. (Photos posted below asImage Table 1.)
In one of the last photo posted in Image Table 1, shown at the bottom of this post below, it shows the “downloading arrow icon” that appeared while I took the screen capture. This is the arrow that indicates to the operator of the cell phone a download is in progress with regard to software updates and/or application downloads. This arrow is visible even though I turned off “software updates” in the “app settings” on my cell phone. In the photo below, I had specifically turned off “software updates” in the settings application in my phone but again my cell phone was high-jacked by my “service providers” communication satellite and it forced a software update over my phone.
I keep “location tracking” (GPS) and “software updates” turned off because there is a direct correlation between the electromagnetic fields my sensory nerves in my body pick up in both my head and lower abdomen (automatic and somatic nervous systems). Screen capture of this can be found in Image Table 1 below. That is to say, I have noticed there is some type of tether between the electromagnetic frequency of my mobile phone and the implants in my head, which may be due to dental implants done through dental surgery as jaw bone conduction is a possibility, and the sensory sensation I feel in my lower body (abdomen).
I have heard through second-hand accounts of sober men, who “don’t really drink alcohol” (meaning they never get drunk), who specifically go into bars and target drunk people by victimizing them. They steal their cash and credit card information. And what do these abusers have to say for themselves? They say, “Their victims were “drunks” who deserved to have their money stolen.” This statement demonstrates a high degree of narcissistic entitlement because they feel they are “more privileged” than other people and are entitled to other people’s property because those people are “inferior.”
I’ve witnessed this criminal behavior in other men as well, as I have myself been victimized in bars with regard to property theft as well as have suffered several sexual assaults both in date rape and other overt/covert sexual violations. Bars are notoriously connected with criminal operations such as drug dealing, prostitution, sexual assault, and property crime. These men who specifically target drunk people and steal their cash do so in a structured organized crime scheme that includes other rogue agents like bartenders. This is how credit card information can be stolen and provided to organized criminal networks working out of certain venues. How do my experiences with my mobile cell phone data, electronic targeted assaults, and psychotronic torture compare to these types of crimes (as well as warfare in general) by men who don’t understand the nature of boundaries and how to respect other people’s rights to privacy and property rights which include the victim’s right to their own body such is the case in sexual assault?
People might conclude that my targeting is domestic abuse-related as some of my family members are known domestic abusers. But there exists the possibility of a likely other outside source. That is to say, a foreign accomplice or accomplices, not of the family but privileged to the family circle. Another source, responsible for victimization because my whole family has been targeted in some way.
As a victim of Domestic Violence and Intimate Partner Violence, I have been arrested and taken to Behavioral Health Hospital as a “crisis patient” in an attempt to “protect” my welfare and distance me from my abusers. I can’t help but believe if Gabby Pepito was taken to a hospital, because she seemed to be experiencing a mental health crisis, she might still be alive. One of the hardest things for authorities to do is mandate a permanent separation between both parties. This is something the individual parties have to do on their own.
The point I am trying to make is this. In 1984, I made friends with a Carnegie Mellon professor in computers and mathematics who told me that we would all have pocket computers in the future. He was talking about Smartphones. We all have them today. He also talked about the field of virtual reality and how it would be an area of interest to developers not to mention artificial intelligence. This has been the intended goal of government, I believe, ever since space travel was a pioneering hope in the area of not only intelligence but military intelligence of man. If he told me this in 1984, imagine what they’re developing today with regard to satellites and artificial intelligence? International neurological brain initiatives and electronic targeted physical assaults and psychotronic torture are real issues neuroethic committees need to address simply because in the near possible future scientists may very well be hacking into your brains in order to “steal your data” void of the use of a cell phone devices.
Another aspect of my Group (Gang) Stalking is the fact that my bodily movement is being tracked while I walk about in my house via implants that may very well be tracked over an independent platform by a rogue intruder, possibly over satellite tracking, but definitely, I believe, through proximity. In other words, this person knows when I wake up, what time I eat, when I sleep, when I use my computer, when I’m using my cell phone, when I leave my house, where I travel to, as well as when I pass gas. Which makes me completely afraid and freaked out of cell phone surveillance. This type of surveillance I just described is primarily used by NSA and CIA in their acquisition of “intelligence” regarding “persons of interest” as a person’s personal habits are recorded to construct a “behavioral profile” so they know how to “take down their target” in which they can further the government/military operations and intelligence missions. Behavioral hospitals may be also interested in gathering this type of “data.” Of course, intelligence gathering and behavioral profiles go hand in hand in clandestine government operations as well as in any organized criminal syndication where a large cash pool could resource the purchase of hi-tech security technology to carry out such “intelligence-gathering operations”. And this is where boundary violations occur in such organized criminal groups demonstrating behaviors utilizing service security surveillance technology to gather intelligence in order to “steal money” from corporations. It is also termed “casing a target.” A similar behavioral profile has been demonstrated by the group known as DarkSide. DarkSide is the criminal group responsible for the Colonial Pipeline ransomware hack. To read one of the press releases from the U.S. Justice Department click on the link https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/department-justice-seizes-23-million-cryptocurrency-paid-ransomware-extortionists-darkside
As a victim of domestic violence and intimate partner violence, I have been arrested and taken to behavioral health hospitals as a “crisis patient” in order to help “protect” me from my abusers. I can’t help but believe if Gabby Pepito was taken to a hospital because she was demonstrating symptoms of some type of mental breakdown, she might still be alive today. Of course, it may not have protected her from a violent death. I believe she was demonstrating symptoms of ADHD. However, these symptoms could have been caused by long-term abuse as well. I watched an informative YouTube video of a child with ADHD and that child described symptoms consistent with the behavior Gabby Petito was exhibiting the day she was pulled over in Moab Utah by police. She had said that morning she had “a lot of work to do on her computer.” I’m not saying she had ADHD or that computer hackers were responsible for her symptoms, I’m just saying there is a possibility she was suffering some type of affective disorder or possible mental breakdown resulting from long-term abuse. Technology can be so frustrating especially if you are being electronically harassed.
Image Table 1 (includes 5 screen captures from my cell phone)
Subnote: With regard to the Gods of this world, tell me who you think God is? Because in the moments we all share together, it’s the moments where there is a clear observable hierarchy of power and just like when someone is intoxicated due to a mind altering substance or is homeless in a vulnerable position, these people become the vulnerable. The side effects and symptoms of psychotronic torture are similar to those intoxicated on a mind altering substance. A substance that lowers one’s conscious level of awareness, making them a more desirable target for victimization through decreased awareness.
Other Published Information Pertinent To Aspects of Criminal Violations:
This post provides a bit more in terms of a forensic analysis of feminine infantile narcissism and object love and its consequential resulting psychopathologies and healthy object selection in the development of normal self-esteem. But more importantly, address the question I left hanging at the bottom of my last post which is:
“How does Freud’s riddle of femininity and the “secret peculiarities” of feminine psychopathology fit into the phenomenology of Group (Gang) Stalking with electronic targeted physical assaults? HINT: knowing age is a determinant to violence even petty passive-aggressive violence
In my previous post, I wrote about some of the “secret peculiarities” of female psychopathologies and some of these characteristics being rooted in immature feminine growth and development. Freud noted there were distinctly evidenced specific traits attributed to femininity such as high degrees of narcissism and a more important desire for them to be loved than to love and this affected their object selection. Otto Kernberg, a psychoanalyst and professor of psychiatry known for his psychoanalytic theories on borderline personality organization and narcissistic pathology, believed normal infantile narcissism in the development of the role the self plays in one’s life is dependent on two things. First, the affirmation of others, and second, the acquisition of desirable and appealing objects which later develops into normal healthy self-esteem. These object selections, as an example, maybe a young girl’s desire for sports/weight training (development for acquiring a metaphorical phallus through competitive competition) or a young girl’s desire for fashion design. Faulty developmental influences can contribute to feminine psychopathologies and persistent egocentricity which contributes to her repetition drive in assaulting others. As an example of such faulty developmental object choices, we might observe a young girl’s desire to become a gang member, part of an organized criminal group where she will receive affirmations regarding her “value to the group”, where worth is determined by the level of violence one is capable of carrying out and/or the selection of drugs and alcohol as substances with which to deal and distribute. This abnormal choice in object selection is often witnessed in cases of parental neglect, abuse, and poverty. Theories central to the analysis of such feminine psychopathologies are primarily Freudian as well as belonging to other ego developmental theories pertinent to psychology like Otto Kernberg and Heinz Kohut and Kleinian object relation theory as well as other object relations perspectives such Donald Winnicott, Robert Fairbain, and John Bowlby.
Since attachments are never fixed as the human psyche is malleable through natural aging and development, the possibility to become unhinged from the arrival at a fixed and normal state as a result of academic work-study and mourning life losses, is always a lurking possibility for all of us, and to which the psychopath knows very well as do psychoanalysts and psychiatrists. We know this because of the pioneering work that has been done and which is central to integrating postwar ego psychology. That is to say, the effects of trauma on the patient and the role trauma plays in undoing otherwise normal healthy growth, healthy attachment, and development. The developmental psychology of the self and the object self in relation to other objects in the environment, under normal conditions, should remain fixed and stable. Under abnormal conditions, a normal stable self can be unraveled and fall into patterns of violence and addiction. This is what postwar psychoanalytic has taught us and to which I believe the phenomenology of Group (Gang) Stalking is being deployed.
I had posited a question at the end of my previous writing, Freud’s Riddle of Femininity and Some of the “Secret Peculiarities” of Female Psychopathologies,
“How does Freud’s riddle of femininity and the “secret peculiarities” of feminine psychopathology fit into the phenomenology of Group (Gang) Stalking with electronic targeted physical assaults? HINT: knowing age is a determinant to violence even petty passive-aggressive violence
We know from reading Shakespeare’s rather comical play, The Taming of the Shrew, the ever-present human desire to control others, especially the opposite Object sex, is an ever-present revolving theme throughout human history. And we know the importance from reading Goethe, the meaning in asking “Is man tempered enough to tame his thirst for power and glory?” This has been an age-old preponderance stretching as far back as classical antiquity wondered about by the fathers of philosophy. And we can surmise society will continue to be an ever-present danger from the psychopath operating in the appearance of a savior welding an electronic weapon with which to “cure the mind” for the purpose of grooming and “tailoring” human subjects’ behavior to their own will.
In my independent studies of psychoanalysis, I have uncovered two areas in psychology specific to detrimental outcomes resulting from side effects from Group (Gang) Stalking with electronic targeted assaults and psychotronic torture. First, unhinging a person’s Internal Locus of Control through repetitive shocks to the human body/mind (trauma). I have included a post link in the resource section below. And secondly, unhinging fixed object attachments through trauma. That is reversing Kernberg’s requirements for the healthy development of self-esteem and the anti-thesis goes like this: First, the disaffirmation of other through punitive punishments (electronic targeted physical assaults and psychotronic torture) and second, the relinquishing of healthy desirable, and appealing object choices and the encouragements in unhealthy object choices with which to develop unhealthy self-esteem and deteriorating sense of self. Such is the change in lifestyle spoken about in the narrative of the phenomenology of Group (Gang) Stalking and often a consequence and side effect to trauma (Sheridan, L; James, D.; & Roth, J., 2020).
Heinz Kohut wrote in 1966 the following:
“Although in theoretical discussions it will usually not be disputed that narcissism, the libidinal investment of the self, is per se neither pathological nor obnoxious, there exists an understandable tendency to look at it with a negatively toned evaluation as soon as the field of theory is left. Where such a prejudice exists, it is undoubtedly based on a comparison between narcissism and object love, and is justified by the assertion that it is the more primitive and the less adaptive of the two forms of libido distribution.” Heinz Kohut, (1966)
In this quote, Kohut is saying that when individuals witness a healthy libidinal interest in the investment of the self, there is usually a tendency to look negatively at it in toned evaluation as soon as we walk away from the study of psychoanalytic theory. In this light, let’s compare the libidinal investment of the self as taking care of their body through healthy diet and exercise (aerobics/weight lifting) as “primitive” and “less adaptive” in terms of “civilized living.” And here, we often hear such people called “lunks”, “jug heads”, or “meatheads”. Of course, referring to their lack of intelligence or aptitude a belief that contributes to the myth-making and hatred against aesthetic physical bodies. Whereas, if the libidinal investment of the self is made in terms of rigorous course work in academics and the development of social bonding within academic groups and where there is less concentration on physical work activity but more mental work in pursuit of higher intelligence (IQ) and a“civilized lifestyle” there seems to be more of an understanding because most people do not have the time nor the resources to dedicate their lives to creating the “perfect body.”When one was in high school, most people witnessed this as “the jock” versus “the nerd” wars. This says something about the juvenile level of narcissism involved in my experiences specifically related to Group (Gang) Stalking with electronic targeted assault and psychotronic torture; and Heinz Kohut says this prejudice regarding libidinal investments of the self exists, undoubtedly, as the result in one’s comparison between their own self narcissistic interests and object love choices against the backdrop of another’s narcissistic interests and object love choices. (And we wonder about the high degrees of narcissism found among Facebook users?) That is to say, that the libidinal investment of one’s own narcissism is in terms of their own peculiar object love selections which are then cast into the shadows of wondering doubt in their own psyche when placed next to others’ narcissistic interests and object love choice. As a result, the resulting insecurities and feelings of inferiority displace original feelings of a secure self, and this results in a display of negative toned evaluation of the Object other. Simply ask yourself what do you value and what are you intimidated by when placed up against other objects in your relational world? Do you value having the best-looking aesthetic physique (hard body), house, car or do you value having the best-looking brain (aptitude of intelligence — IQ)? In the case of Facebook users, when individuals preview other individual’s social media timeline may ask, “What is my worth?”“Do I, in fact, “measure up.” This is something we all do; doctors, lawyers, bus drivers, stay-at-home mothers, teachers, etc. However, those with faulty and abnormal self-esteem may react with aggressive recourse in attacking others. This has been my experience using Facebook and social media when one’s achievements are displayed in one’s timeline for all to see, it will inevitably affect someone who does not possess those same experiences. And someone who has not received adequate admiration and affirmations in their early childhood development may react with violence or passive-aggressive violence.
Here we can bring into the discussion Judith Butler’s writing The Force of Nonviolence: An ethico-political bind. Butler distills the problem down to a basic question of utility. The distillates materialize as one pre-emptive question and it is “What groups matter and what groups do not? Who are the valued individuals and who are nonvaluable and disposable? This simple question will, at times, seem to cloud even some of the best minds in psychoanalysis because it is as Jaques Lacan had written in 1978 in The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book II, “The images of man’s body is the principle of every unity he perceives in objects . . . all the objects of his world are always structured around the wondering shadows of his own ego.” And it was Freud who said, “The body is first and foremost a bodily ego (Freud, 1923).” This is true for both females and males alike. Although the attributes to a masculine shape differ from the attributes of a feminine shape, they are both important and valued shapes by the corresponding subjects with regard to their “peculiar” and valued characteristics.
In Bodies that Matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”, Judith Butler provides us with an original reformulation of the materiality of bodies, examining how the power of heterosexual hegemony forms the “matter” of bodies, sex, and gender and this holds true, at least as far as my personal experience with Group (Gang) Stalking, electronic targeted physical assault, and psychotronic torture. That is to say, there seems to be a very real heterosexual hegemony (ego and libidinal interest) with regard to certain cases of Group (Gang-Related) Stalking. Upon further analysis, we discover that bodies can move beyond the boundaries of their physical attributes and characteristics as in the quote “A man is more than just a man.” And for that matter, “A woman is more than just a woman.” Thereby placing the Objects outside of their realm of just another “sexualized body” with which to use and exploit. And what follows the negative toned evaluation of Other, oftentimes, ends up as acts of humiliation of Other rooted in the comparison of one’s own libidinal investment of one’s own narcissism in terms of one’s own peculiar object love selections against the backdrop of Other.
In a paper written in 2015 entitled, Ainsworth Strange Situation Procedure: The Origin of an Instrument, about Mary Ainsworth’s development of the instrument known as “The Strange Situation” in which childhood attachment was evaluated, the paper quotes; “So powerful is this technique in evoking behavioral changes that it is likely to be used with increasing frequency in studies of mother-infant interactions (Ainsworth & Bell, 1970).” In like view, we might also say something similar regarding the “instruments” (electronic devices) used in the phenomenon of Group (Gang) Stalking. We could then compare these instruments of group (gang) related stalking and classify them as weapons and/or counterphobic mechanical objects and consider the theories of Donald Winnicott in which the child’s use of counterphobic inanimate objects exist to help defend and protect the child from resulting fears surrounding separation anxiety felt from perceived feelings of abandonment in the child. This sets up a possible forensic analysis as a perpetrator with a possible borderline personality disorder.
Bretherton, I. (1992). The Origins of Attachment Theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. Developmental Psychology, 28(5), 759–775.
Chatterji, A. (2009). “Psychoanalysis and the Unconscious” and D.W. Winnicott’s Transitional and Related Phenomena. The Psychoanalytic Review, 96(5), 785–800.
Chescheir, M., & Schulz, K. (2004). The development of a capacity for concern in antisocial children: Winnicott’s concept of human relatedness. Clinical Social Work Journal, 17(1), 24–39.
Chung, G., Jensen, T., Parisi, A., Macy, R., & Lanier, P. (2021). Impact of Intimate Partner Violence on Parenting and Children’s Externalizing Behaviors: Transactional Processes Over Time. Violence Against Women, OnlineFirst, 1
Crittenden, P. (2017). Gifts from Mary Ainsworth and John Bowlby. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 22(3), 436–442.
Cyber Misbehavior. United States Attorneys’ Bulletin. Department of Justice. Vol. 64, №3, May 2016. United States v. Matusiewicz:Lessons Learned from the First Federal Prosecution of Cyberstalking Resulting in Death by Jamie M. McCall and Shawn A. Weede.
Davis, Doug. Notes on Freud’s Femininity. HaverfordCollege.eduAnalysis is more an analysis of immature femininity and pairing egocentricity of adolescence rooted in the abnormal development of infantile narcissism.
Fabozzi, P. (2016). The Use of the Analyst and the Sense of Being Real: The Clinical Meaning of Winnicott’s “The Use of Object”. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 85(1), 1–34.
Feldmann, T., & Johnson, P. (1992). The Selfobject Function of Weapons: A Self Psychology Examination. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 20(4), 561–576.
Freud, S. (1909). Analysis of a Phobia in a Five-year-old boy (Little Hans). In Standard Edition, Volume 10. pp 5–149. London. Hogarth Press.
______, S. (1918). From the History of an Infantile Neurosis (The Wolf Man). In Standard Edition, Volume 17. pp. 127–133.
_______, S. (1919). A child is being beaten: A contribution to the study of the origin of sexual perversions. In Standard Edition. Volume 17, pp. 175–204.
_______, S. (1923). The Ego and the Id. Volume 19. In Standard Edition. London. Hogarth Press.
_______, S. (1924). The dissolution of the Oedipus complex. In Standard Edition, Vol. 7. London. Hogarth Press.
_______, S. (1931). Libidinal Types. In Standard Edition. Volume 21. (217–220).
_______, S. (1931). Female Sexuality. In Standard Edition. Volume 21. (223–243).
_______, S. (1933). New Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis. In Standard Edition. Volume 22. (3 -182)
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von. (1950). Faust: a tragedy. Translated by Bayard Taylor. New York. Modern Library.
Harris, J. (1982). Ainsworth on Attachment. Adoption & Fostering, 6(4), 57–58.
Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An Integrative Review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252–264.
Haslam, N., & Loughnan, S. (2014). Dehumanization and Infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 399–423.
Jacobs, Amber. (2007). On Matricide: Myth, Psychoanalysis, and the Law of the Mother. New York. Columbia University Press.
_________, A. (2007). The Potential of Theory: Melanie Klein, Luce Irigaray, and the Mother‐Daughter Relationship. Hypatia, 22(3),
Matsangidou, Maria; Otterbacher, Jahna. Can Posting Be A Catalyst for Dating Violence — Social Media Behaviors and Physical Interactions. Gender Violence. Vol. 5, №3. Published online September 12, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2017.0051.This article is important to the analysis of violence promoted as a result of social media interactions and its consequential side effects on those possessing high degrees of narcissism.
Niedecken, D. (2016). The primal scene and symbol formation. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 97(3), 665–683.
Rosmalen, L., Veer, R., & Horst, F. (2015). Ainsworth’s Strange Situation Procedure: The Origin of an Instrument. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 51(3), 261–284. The paper quotes, “So powerful is this technique in evoking behavioral changes that it is likely to be used with increasing frequency in studies of mother-infant interactions (Ainsowrth & Bell, 1970).”
Sarteschi, Christine M (Ph.D). (2017). Jodi Arias: A Case of Extreme Violence. Violence and Gender. Vol. 4, №3. This paper is of particular interest because Jodi Arias is believed to be a case of Borderline Personality Disorder and prior to killing Alexander Travis, she carried out passive-aggressive forms of violence such as stalking his residents and damaging his property. One might theorize, as the literature suggests, such passive-aggressive violence can be a pre-cursor to more serious forms of targeted violence.
Shakespeare, William. The Complete Works of William Shakespeare. Reprinted from a folio dated 1632. Stanford, CT. Longmeadow Press. The Taming of the Shrew (pp. 287 –313).
In the literary analysis of Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew the work has been analyzed as the marriage between two willing partners whose final conclusion ends as a form of “baptism” or “cleansing”, which coincidentally can also be analyzed as the path of normal growth which ultimately takes place between to “civilized” people of marriage who often find themselves in conflict with one another and is symbolic to Bram Dijkstra’s Idols of Perversity: Fantasies of feminine evil in the fin de siècle culture. In this post, I make a literary as well as philosophical connection in comparative literature between religious baptism and Dante’s Purgatorio and William Shakespeare’s Taming of the Shrew and the “baptism” of electronic targeted physical assaults and psychotronic torture of Group (Gang) Stalking. That is to say, as “a cleansing experience that wipes clean” the memory, social status, and other blemishes of identity the targeted victim represents to society. Certainly, the transcendental often spoken of as happening in marriage between a man and a woman, and in regard to the analysis of The Taming of The Shrew and which, at least to me, seems always in favor of the male, ruling authority, or controlling power figure. In fact, the entire above referenced literary comparison between the two sources is done with the couples agreed upon consent and intentions toward some type of marriage. I then make a contrasting comparison between Group (Gang) Stalking with electronic targeted physical assault and psychotronic torture and the marriage contract or partnership/friendship that has dissolved between the group stalker and the victim’s intention to render the partnership as dissolved, the group stalker continues some type of arrangement with regard to the partnership.For where would a group stalker be without their intended victim? In other words, a former love interest of the victim, someone familiar to the victim such as a friend or business associate, or even a possibly a perturbed neighbor has suffered a narcissistic blow either by the victim themselves or as a result of the victim’s unintentional actions.
Please keep in mind that in regard to William Shakespeare’s Taming of The Shrew the reference to “supernatural happiness” and “overall happiness” alluded to by academic analysis belonging to “virtuous activities.” That is to say, happiness is not found in prostituting oneself, being highly selfish and narcissistic, or in other such activities that promote impurities such as drunkenness and other lude, wild behaviors such as being outspoken, opinionated, or promiscuous. This concept is directly promoted by institutions of higher learning because it benefits the economy and social welfare of society by promoting shared work responsibilities between committed partners such as paying taxes, buying real estate, and contributing to desired social values. This contributes to the benefits of promoting the shared values within a society (community), a group, by creating cohesive groups rooted in shared values of upstanding lifestyle. It also promotes and ensures the continuity of the growth of families as having children results in most marriage arrangements. All of which is true and, and in fact, should be promoted to young academics in pursuit of knowledge and understanding of virtuous behavior. However, it unwittingly also contributes to the formation of myth-making, the kinds of myths that have been witnessed as religious inquisitions, witch trials, and genocides.
In the Taming of the Shrew, the role of the shrew is acted by Katherine, and she is known for her negative outlook concerning life. She does not believe that there is good in anything and is often in an extremely foul mood. The main reason why she acts in such a manner is because she envies her beautiful and younger sister known as Bianca. She is envious of her younger sister who had many suitors, while she did not have any. Many men wanted to marry Bianca and often ignored Katherine, and most likely it is due to her negative attitude and poor disposition. It is a fact among people that if any man would want to marry Katherine, then it would be the same for Bianca. This is the reason why Katherine is a shrew that needs to be tamed. Enter Petruchio who is in desperate need of a wife and, as it plays out, Petruchio sets his sites on Katherine as her father cannot stand her anymore either and is willing to pay in order to marry her off.
As Petruchio begins to try and tame Katherine he becomes as annoying and harassing as she. But Petruchio understands that in order for him to be successful he must tame her without changing her inner spirit. For to do such a thing would break her original inner identity (her spirit) and this would be considered unethical. Although Shakespeare doesn’t use the word “grooming” he likens the taming to a “tailoring.” We experience these images of “tailoring” when he uses phrases like “Thy gown’s Why, aye. Come, tailor, let us see’st. / O mercy, God! What masquing stuff is here’s / What’s this A sleeve’s Tis like a demi-cannon. / What, up and down, carved like an apple tart’s / Here’s snip and nip and cut and slish and slash, Like to a sensor in a barber’s shop”. It has been analyzed that he seeks to tame Katherine using acceptable ways, and without causing her heartache. And in the course of Petruchio’s taming he encounters many personalities of Katherine, no doubt, as a result of the imposed abuse.
In reading Dante Alighieri’s Purgatorio and the concept of formative virtue in Canto 25, a very interesting idea on how the spirits (Dante calls them shades) materialize upon death. It has to do with an idea of Informative Virtues, a philosophical idea that the regenerative power of the seed creates similar life forms. An example Dante used in this canto was a sea-fungus, when it undertakes the reorganization process of meiosis, the seed takes on the virtue from the generator’s heart. Upon death, the soul takes on an aerial body and will stand either on the River Archeron (to await Hell) or stand on the River Tiber (to await salvation). Thus, upon death, all souls according to their hearts are either damned or saved. The allegory used here recalls Luke 6:43–45 where Jesus taught that good trees produce good fruits and likewise, bad trees will produce bad fruits. (logic)
The connection we can draw is in the sacrament of baptism as a religious ritual and the cleansing transcendental experience rooted in religious commitment and study, if we place this against acts of genocide also a ritualized form of behavior where ritualized acts of “cleansing” are utilized, we can come to a formal understanding of how subtle a device linguistics and semiotics in philosophy can be when these ideas of baptism and cleansing are transformed in the nonvirtuous person’s mind. An idea I have termed “informative nonvirtue” with the intent of turning a person’s will to bend toward the wishes of the controller. Albeit, in the spirit of higher academic learning, the “taming in marriage” as analyzed in Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew is meant to convey the idea that although the trials and tribulations of consecrated marriage are sometimes painful for those who lie under its burdens, burdens that are willfully consented to, those tribulations can yield beautiful results as pain and suffering have the ability to transcend living souls to higher planes of existence. And in that we mean, maturity.
In terms of the phenomenology of Group (Gang) Stalking and group psychopathology where there is neither a contract of agreed formal consent to participate as a “willing participant” or “member” of the Group’s (Gang’s) activities nor a recognized legal ritual that condones such behavior as an acceptable part of societal living, such as we see in the consecration of sacraments of Eucharist and Penance. In this light, there is a burden placed, unwillingly I might add, on the victim which forces him or her to sacrifice their identity and suffer losses of not only the body and mind but of civil liberties as well, Fourth Amendment civil liberties. Here I used Janine Chasseguet-Smirgel’s reference to a movie shown in Paris during the 1970s entitled The Corpse Incinerator and its psychoanalytic connections to genocide. The story is of a criminal pervert necrophile which makes a perfect example to demonstrate the metempsychosis that in all things annihilation does not exist and that things simply “change form.” In the changing of form we can illustrate the victim’s “loss of identity.” The main character in the movie is a crematorium worker who believes how beautiful a thing death is and that it is in death that one is freed from the soul. The body is clearly likened to a “blemish” that the main character in the movie helps to get rid of. He himself will become the murderer of his wife and children because they have “impure blood” in them. We see the use of mysticism to magnify the power of the pervert to remove all “fecal character to transform excrement into gold and to transform digestion — which in the movie is combustion, just like incineration — into a marvelous alchemy freeing the soul from the body which has become nothing more than refuse.” Bela Grunberger (1959), and a contemporary psychoanalyst to Janine Chasseguet-Smirgel, wrote of “digestion as a fragmentation of ingested food and its degradation into less and less differentiated elements, which progressively lose their former peculiarities, and forming finally a homogeneous mass, the fecal bolus.” In this movie, the fetish is combustion/incineration. We can compare the incinerator itself as the main character’s counter-phobic object which acts much like the counter-phobic objects we might see used by many religious individuals and mystics known as amulets and crystals. In this light, we can then theorize the fetish is witnessing the destruction through a “changing of form” such as in the sexual deviance of body inflation fantasies. The counterphobic object, when it comes to the phenomenology of Group (Gang) Stalking, is the mechanical electronic device that offers the perpetrator control over the victim’s body/mind/and outcomes. In the fetish of body inflation fantasies, in particular, those that restrain partners thereby making them immobile, the counter phobic objects would be the rubber suits and air compressors they use to provide “relief” from unconscious phantoms lurking in the shadows of the pervert’s psyche and to which provide the pervert satisfaction in overcoming such phantoms.
The Freudian connections to human sexuality, in particular of those belonging to the anal stage (anility) and resulting psychopathology of the anal-sadistic universe, can be drawn and concluded in both literary readings as one can imagine how distorted beliefs can inform logic and in the following notes gleaned from Dante’s Purgatorio and the Catholic Church’s idea of purging the soul of sins as a realm in the afterlife following the death of an unpure soul and to which the whole idea of penance and punishments is supposed to accomplish. However, penance and punishment, as a form of “cleansing the soul” and the transcendental experience of growth through “marriage” is done between two groups or two individual members of a society consenting to the ritualized agreed-upon behavior.
In making an analysis between the two literary comparisons and considering the phenomenology of Group (Gang) Stalking where there is neither a contract of agreed formal consent to participate as a willing participant or amember in the ritualized activities nor is it neither recognized as a legal religious ritual or even acceptable secular ritual that is permitted by law. So, to allow the behavior of stalking to continue as part of ritualized societal living is an abomination. As such, we see in the consecration of the sacraments of Eucharist and Penance an agreed-upon, acceptable form of ritualized behavior that doesn’t inflict harm on society. In terms of the phenomenology of Group (Gang) Stalking and group psychopathology, there is a burden placed, unwillingly I might add, on the victim which forces him or her to sacrifice their identity and suffer losses of the body and mind through ritualized punishments. Here I used Janine Chasseguet-Smirgel’s reference to a movie shown in Paris during the 1970s entitled The Corpse Incinerator, mentioned above, and its psychoanalytic connections to genocide and other forms of ethnic as well as religious cleansings (Holocausts and Inquisitions).
In further analysis, the idea of formative virtue is explained by Statius. Statius explains the part of the body’s blood that is responsible for sperm production is never used by the body except to create life. They had an understanding of how life-giving blood was shared in the activity of coitus and childbearing, although this particular explanation lacks scientific clarity. Statius explains, that it never enters the veins but rather enters another way. Thus, Virtue Informative, (meiosis process) takes place when this blood enters the “natural vase” of a woman’s womb through recombination of DNA. It is in this vaginal vase where the two blood types intermingle to create one life. Dante describes the female as “passive” and the male as “active.”Freud would later come to use this reasoning of “active” and “passive” gender roles of sexuality in his formulation of an entirely new field of study known as psychoanalysis. And by this “active virtue,” the soul is created. That is, the male is responsible for passing the virtues of his heart to his offspring. No doubt there was an observed understanding of active masculinities, most likely observed in warfare as the male-on-male acts of aggression. Statius explains further, much like a sea-fungus, when the reorganization process takes place in the womb, this power comes from “the powers whose seed it is.” That is, a sea-fungus will regenerate into another sea-fungus, likewise, a heart full of evil virtues will regenerate another full of evil virtues. Like begets like. “Nature is intent on all its members.” This idea is expressed in Luke 6:43–45 when Jesus says “good trees produce good fruits and likewise, bad trees produce bad fruits. Thus, the primal Motor, God, brings life into the soul by breathing intellectual life into it. “For without God, nothing is possible.” This understanding would influence Western thinking for quite some time, providing male patriarchy the power. However, it isn’t until the works of Melanie Klein we come to understand, in psychoanalytic terms, the power of nurture and the maternal vertical influence on the masculine and feminine psyche.
To continue Statius explanation, he says that as a result of this “active virtue”, the three aspects of the soul are created; memory, intelligence, and will. When freed from our earthly bodies; memory, intelligence and will become more active and upon death, the Informative Virtue of the body draws on the air around it to produce a visible aerial body. The spirits (shades) Dante sees in the afterlife are a result of this process. This is the reason Statius gives as to the emancipated soul’s appearance on the Terrace of Gluttony. Interestingly, Peter Bondanella and Julia Conaway Bondanella state that church doctrine supported the idea that after death, the soul remained without anybody until Judgment Day, at which time it would be resurrected as a whole body. Of course, this reasoning is most likely derived from the fact the Bible expresses a more black and white view of salvation. You are either saved or you are not. Purgatory is a completely new philosophical device derived from the writings of an Italian man who lived during the 13th and 14th centuries, Dante. Another connection to the formulation of Purgatory and the Catholic Church’s institution of confession and penance as another ritualized form of behavior and to which has not only been incorporated into Church doctrine but has changed shape over time. The Catholic Church’s awareness, as a reasoning logic, is confession as a form of “talk therapy,” helps cleanse the soul or “purge” the soul of its impurities. It is at this point we can make another connection to the clandestine eavesdropping taking place with regard to my personal form of targeting. Guilty men don’t confess their sins. Well, those guilty men lacking a conscience and who are smart enough to keep quiet. Another aspect to this understanding is that grown men and women, who as young children had their conscience formed and shaped as subjects under this Catholic Church doctrine cannot sleep well at night unless they confess their sins. Those who have achieved a conscious awareness and have become mindful of their actions. This is the idea between my notion of “nonvirtue informative” and virtue informative and where love and respect for God and Jesus prevails and promotes the idea of “supernatural happiness” or “overall happiness” of the individual as analyzed in The Taming of The Shrew.
The Terrace of Lust and The “Purging” Through Electromagnetic Tailoring (aka Grooming) and Targeted Assaults
In Dante’s Purgatorio, when Virgil, Statius, and Dante arrive on the Terrace of Lust, they witness a wall of flames that shoots forth. Flames of fire from the inner wall to the outside wall that lick heat and fire. The canto implies these shooting flames are intermittent, frequent blasts that drive the souls back. As a result, the three must walk closely to the outside wall so as not to be burned. The souls on this terrace are chanting in Latin, “Summoe Deus dlementioe” which means “God of Supreme clemency.” They also shout, “Virum non cognosco” which means “I know not a man.” At the end of the canto an example of chastity is taken from the classical literature of the god Diana who ran to the woods to protect her own chastity through isolation, seclusion as a result of shame, and is attributed to a very feminine psychological element. Diana is the personification of femininity.
In this canto, the connection between the shooting and licking flames that burst forth that “drive the souls back” who committed the sin of Lust in their lifetimes can be compared to Petruchio’s taming of Katherine as well as the electromagnetic frequencies cast in electronic torture and psychotronic torture. This symbolism of “reforming the subject” is recreated and carried out in Group (Gang) Stalking with electromagnetic targeted physical assaults and psychotronic torture. Of course, on all of Dante’s terraces in his Purgatorio we observer this concept of “grooming” or “reforming the subject”, and as Shakespeare would say it, “a tailoring” through “snip and nip and cut and slash” or subjugation through power and electricity. Hence the chanting phrase, “Summoe Deus Dlementioe” or “God of Supreme clemency.” The God of Supreme forgiveness. We can make this connection between a “Supreme God” and “his followers”, the value in a possessed treasure of a wife as analyzed in The Taming of The Shrew and the power of Despots over the “human trash that makes life in his street part of the world of the unclean.” To which of these three areas do the nonvirtuous activities of Group (Gang) Stalking belong? A Supreme God, the possessed treasure of a wife, or the despot’s power to “transform the human garbage that litters his streets into fucking gold through technological service security surveillance as a paid-for product?”
Alighieri, Dante. (2005) The Purgatorio. Translated by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow. New York. Barnes & Nobel Classics. Originally published in Italian during the 14th century.
Shakespeare, William. The Complete Works of William Shakespeare. Reprinted from a folio dated 1632. Stanford, CT. Longmeadow Press. (pp. 287 –313).
New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures. Brooklyn, NY. Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. Book of Luke.
Chasseguet-Smirgel, Janine. (1984). Creativity and Perversion. London. Free Association Books.
Chodorow, Nancy J. (2012). Individualizing Gender and Sexuality: Theory and Practice. Relational Books Perspective, Volume 53. New York. Routledge; Taylor & Francis Group.
Early Christians referred to the Eucharistic elements, during ceremonial Mass, as “The Body and Blood of Jesus” which were represented symbolically as unleavened bread known as a communion wafer and red wine made from grapes respectively. The Didache, one of the earliest Christian texts outside the New Testament to speak of the Eucharist says, “Let no one eat or drink of your Eucharist unless they have been baptized into the name of the Lord, for concerning this also the Lord has said, “Give not that which is holy to the dogs.”
Ignatius of Antioch, a founding church father and the priest who would systematically compile the Bible as we now have it today, wrote to the Roman Christians in AD 106 saying: “I desire the bread of God, the heavenly bread, the bread of life, which is the flesh of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who became afterward of the seed of David and Abraham, and I desire the drink of God, namely His Blood, which is the incorruptible love and eternal life.”
When the plate of unleavened bread and the cup of red wine are consecrated by the priest during Mass, the Catholic doctrine of transubstantiation is believed to have occurred. That is, they believe that an actual changing of the bread and wine into the nourishing substance of Jesus Christ himself has taken place. This is a symbolic ritual that demonstrates to all who observe, the faith of the followers’ belief in the word and teaching of the one true God and his only begotten Son whom he sent to save us from our sins through an ultimate sacrifice on the cross.
Dante Alighieri, who wrote The Divine Comedy, in the Purgatorio speaks of this idea of Formative Virtue. Dante explains to his readers, Formative Virtue is the part of the body’s blood that is responsible for sperm production and the energy transfer that is used to create life (Canto XXV). He explains that Formative Virtue never enters the veins and remains in the genitalia. The idea of Formative Virtue, which is a philosophy that closely resembles the transfer of DNA through the process of meiosis, demonstrates there was a remedial understanding in genetics and scientific knowledge by earlier Catholic followers that blood, as a life-giving force, was capable of transmitting genetic characteristics to offspring. Dante explains through his character Statius in Canto XXV, that the process of Virtue Informative occurs in the “natural vase” (a woman’s womb) when “that part of the blood that creates life” (sperm) enters. It is in this “vaginal vase” where the two types of blood intermingle to create another unique life. Like Sigmund Freud, it was also believed that the female played a “passive” part in all of this and that the male played an “active” role. And through the male’s “active” role, Formative Virtue would be created in the soul of the offspring when life first begins in the woman’s womb. Here we see the misogynistic theme of a male-patterned dominant authority that places the male at the head of the household, and the one being totally responsible for passing the virtues of his heart to his offspring since the females are “passive” to their male counterparts one and only authority. Thus, the logic seemed to be females fully lack this powerful capability of transferring divine knowledge or “divine goodness.”
Statius explains further to Dante, much like a sea-fungus, when the reorganization process takes place in the womb during early gestation, the power of Formative Virtue comes not from the female, but from “the powers whose seed it is.” That is, a sea-fungus will regenerate into another sea-fungus, likewise, a heart full of evil virtues will regenerate into another heart full of evil virtues. Like begets like. “Nature is intent on all its members.” This idea is expressed in Luke 6:43–45 when Jesus says “good trees produce good fruits and likewise, bad trees produce bad fruits.” Thus, the primal Motor, God, brings life into the soul by breathing intellectual life into it. “For without God, nothing is possible”.
It was believed that it was only through faith in God and Jesus Christ, through the study of the bible and one’s faith, one was capable of producing good fruit. As a result, the Motor or God, thru the active male role during copulation brings life into the soul of his offspring and creates three aspects of the soul; (1) Memory,(2) Intelligence, and (3) Will.When freed from our earthly bodies, early Catholics believed Memory, Intelligence, and Will becomes more active and upon death, the Informative Virtue of the body draws on the air around it to produce a visible aerial body or “ghostly” like an apparition. From this philosophy the doctrine of transubstantiation evolved and belief that the dead can walk among us on earth in an ethereal form. This is where belief in God is a schizophrenic symptom. Ghosts and God cannot be proven and so, according to the psychiatric community, represent classic schizophrenia.
Ideologically Motivated Violence
Sir John Falstaff. Sir John Falstaff is a fictional character in four of William Shakespeare’s plays; Henry IV (Part I), Henry IV (Part II), Henry V, and Merry Wives of Windsor. Sir John Falstaff’s character is based on the non-fictional character of Sir John Oldcastle who was a distinguished soldier that served in the Welsh wars and who became a martyr of the Lollards, a late medieval English sect derived from the teachings of John Wycliffe. Oldcastle was less Falstaff-like than how Shakespeare chooses to portray him. That is, as a fat, vain, boastful, and cowardly knight who spends most of his time drinking at the Boar’s Head Inn with petty criminals, living on stolen or borrowed money. However, Falstaff, like Oldcastle, was a friend of King Henry V. Oldcastle had befriended “Hal” in the Welsh wars in which both men served. Through the lens of medieval English politics, it is believed that Oldcastle was probably more widely perceived as a “criminal”.
In a confession of his faith, Oldcastle declared his belief in the sacraments and the necessity of penance and true confession, but he would not assent to the orthodox doctrine of the sacrament as stated by the Bishops, nor admit the necessity of confession to a priest. He also said the veneration of images was “the great sin of idolatry”, and, on 25 September, he was convicted as a heretic and sentenced to death for his beliefs but not before escaping several times and being re-captured several times until that faithful day on December 14. On 14 December 1417, he was hung over a fire that would consume the whole gallows. It was not clear whether or not he was burned alive or not.
What made Oldcastle so tenaciously successful in eluding English authority?Secrecy and supporters. The number one characteristic of any successful military campaign is “silent invisibility” and the ability to blend in within a crowd, and possessing secret supporters who hide their allegiance with you. This is how many successful undercover operations operate as well as the clandestine use of electronic targeted harassment and psychotronic torture, the only element that establishes similar types of acts as criminal, rests solely in the power of the ability of spies who keep your secret clandestinely covered up. How you justify killing or murder, even mass murder, depends on which philosophical lens you conduct your analysis.
Here we see a historical reference and a similarity to what we have come to know in modern history as “ideologically motivated violence.” In religious persecutions, where many are killed for adhering to their faith and disobeying the superior ruling orders or ruling class, can be perceived no differently. Religious or political persecutions/executions that are carried out by the more powerful ruling majority or powerless minority are nothing new to human history. We can view these as another example of how conflict is handled, a conflict that was moving towards a change or a revolution within the society by utilizing the enlightened knowledge of evolving philosophical thought based on a different interpretation of Orthodox religious philosophy and the true meaning of Christ’s teachings.
Thus, the transfer of values and virtues (aka Formative Virtue) are not, in fact, actually transferred to Christian followers who consume the consecrated “body and blood” of Christ during Mass. It is transferred during the educational process of learning and study, early child-rearing, and academic learning. This is where Ignatius of Antioch was fully committed to providing the future Christian community with a Bible that expressed, in his opinion, the best teachings and texts that had circulated following the crucifixion of Christ, with the ritual of Mass being more symbolic of the commitment made by Christian followers to Christ than an actual act of cannibalism. It symbolically demonstrates their learned faith and belief in Christ as the Son of God, it also demonstrates that they have digested the teachings of God and Christ and are attempting to actively demonstrate their beliefs to others through direct example. This is the beginning of the transubstantiation process, that process that transforms and elevates lowly men into a higher being with a higher purpose rooted in the best interest of the community and the Church. This is the food that Ignatius wanted future followers to “eat” and “digest”. You might say it was “food” capable of inspiring “ideologically motivated peace.”
Similar to the transfer of values and virtues, that is, the transubstantiation of formative virtue is the transfer of emotional states. Emotional states can be transferred to one another quite readily. Christ addressed this issue in Luke 6:29, “If someone strikes you on one cheek, turn to him the other also. And if someone takes your cloak, do not withhold your tunic as well.” This is a concept that is at the heart of “the cure” in psychoanalysis and the transfer of emotional states. It is the job of the analyst to guard against emotional triggers that may set him/her off. One of the first signs that a person has done the work of mourning is an objective awareness of how one thinks, and what one says, and how one acts, and if it is not validating or supportive toward another person or persons. I believe this is a continual process and one that is supported in faith-based learning practices that are continued throughout one’s life. It can be said similarly of the continual learning process through reading, writing, and study.
Part of female identity capital (sometimes called culture capital) is body size and weight. I believe culture capital is appropriate because traditionally speaking, the wealthy were thin while lower-class women tended to be “full-bodied.” I’d like to go out on a limb here and say, in Hollywood, there are more black, overweight, female actresses than white actresses. Although shallow and insignificant as this may seem, the truth discovered in the pursuit of psychoanalytic study is this. Narcissistic egos can run deep and men and women are narcissistic. To humiliate and demean an Object in your object-relational world by electronically stimulating a person’s brain in an uncontrolled environment, in random attacks, during sleep, and especially during early waking hours leads to the onset of behavioral change is what narcissists do. This is the intrusive element electronic targeted assaults take as a characteristic of stalking. The early morning hours are no longer the hours the target is allowed to work out. The controller/operator has now decided she must not be allowed an avenue to health.Why? Working out provides health benefits such as stress reduction and maintenance, lower blood sugar, lower blood pressure, and heart health. According to the controller/operator, this is a crime that must not be defined as murder because there is no statute of limitations on murder, therefore it must remain ambiguous and hard to define. After all, it is a cultural murder, a murder of female identity capital. When you can’t define the crime, how can you prosecute it for what it truly represents?
“what . . . any inquisition really is: a set of disciplinary practices targeting specific groups, codified in law, organized systematically, enforced by surveillance, exemplified by severity, sustained over time, backed by institutional power, and justified by a vision of the one true path. Considered that way, the Inquisition is more accurately viewed not as a relic, but as a harbinger.”
Gangstalking, electronic targeted physical assaults, and psychotronic torture are a form of derision. The bullying, tyranny, and unfair treatment of marginalized groups are tolerated in some third-world countries like Afghanistan and India, but in the United States of America, it is outlawed. We have stalking laws.
The Coward Hides His Face
The coward hides his face, and exposing the coward’s face to the broader group about the abuse he represents is the power the operator/controller hands over to the victim. I have that power because I am the victim. The difference in “identity status,” to some women, is represented as characteristics such as youth,beauty, dress size, and wallet size. The paranoid fear that dances around the shadows of someone suffering the mental illness of the paranoid splitting rooted in the castration complex, when a lack of this insider identity is realized as well as the lack of identifiers that would signify status recognition such as youth, beauty, dress size, become the very objects of coveted envy. Coveted envy leads to callous hatred, acts of clandestine violence, and forms in believed narcissistic supremacy. John Steinbeck said it best when he said in poverty his daughter would be envious and in riches, she would be a snob. “Money does not change the sickness, only the symptoms.”Identity capitalis a form of currency. All those things we hold dear to us that give us our identity. What are they? Are you the fastest swimmer? Are you the fastest runner? Are you the fastest problem solver? Are you athletic? Are you the most beautiful in your family? What are you better at and who would capitalize the most on making sure you don’t have those skills?
I have a brother-in-law who has all the finest things. He is like this. If, I have hummingbirds visit my yard because I garden and plant flowers. Once he finds out, he must “one-up me.” Everything seems to be a competition. He purchased a trellis and beautiful flowering plant that attracts hummingbirds. At one point, I was using a digital camera to take pictures and I voiced a wish to buy a good camera and become a better photographer. What does he do? Buys a professional camera and goes out of his way to “show it off.” It’s petty but maddening. It would appear he’s the covetous type. He is also tied to my same-sex twin sibling. I call her my Dark Twin.
After I had begun to be electronically targeted with physical electronic assaults that prevented me from doing work. (I am a diabetic and I need to physically move my body to burn blood sugar). My brother-in-law and sister both came to my garden and ripped out everything I planted and threw it away and re-arranged it to produce more food because she said, “You can’t take care of it anymore.” Is this why I’m being electronically tortured? So they can have my garden? He violated my boundaries that day because some of those plants I purchased and cultivated to a bigger size. And now, I find myself targeted. I’m being abused by some unseen force (electro-magnetic) that sends vibrational energy to points located in my body (lower abdomen and head/teeth). I wonder, is he the one who is doing this?Are their accomplices involved? Since the concept of stalking denotes a pattern of repeated, unwanted intrusion by one person into the life of another in a manner that causes distress, disruption, or fear, I am fairly secure in saying I am being stalked. Stalking often employees third-parties in what is called “proxy stalking.” After the recognition of equal rights for women and the prosecution of domestic violence, stalking has become an unacceptable behavior in the Western world. Stalking is a social construct that arises in particular social and cultural contexts.
My next-door neighbors at 1241 Indiana have people from India as either visitors or relatives to their home environment. I’m looking at them as suspects because of the social, cultural, and ethnic differences some Indian men possess in beliefs toward their women. The issues in Afghanistan, following the fall of Kabul surrounding women’s rights, are a perfect example of how oppression works and the cultural capital of identity is promoted and thereby demoting other identities in the process. To describe an example, a man from India or from Afghanistan might promote his “authentic authority” based on his gender, positional of power, masculine identity, and wealth as a man while systematically demoting “inauthentic identities” such as girls, women, the poor, those who helped the Americans during the Afghan war. This is a gendered/status refusal tied to the imaginary symbolics in philosophy and the muting of feminine voices based on gender politics. The female silenced body is rendered in Plato’s cave metahphor.
Take this information back to the beginning of the post, in what I said in the opening. Part of female identity capital (sometimes called culture capital) is body size and weight. I believe culture capital is appropriate because traditionally speaking, the wealthy were thin while lower-class women tended to be “full-bodied.” To torture a woman for this purpose would be to “one down her identity capital.” And as I said, a female’s identity capital is no different than men’s. It is all bound to those identity markers and status symbols, that marks us as the “signified” by “the signifier.”What are your identity and status markers? These are some examples of identity markers; male/female, fat/thin, 30s/40s, white/black, beautiful/unattractive, prim/careless, adorned/unadorned, educated/uneducated, employed/unemployed, father/nonparent, Polish/German, immigrant/citizen, competitive athlete/non-competitive, academic/nonacademic?These are your identity markers and your status markers.How well do you know your enemies?
Additionally, identity markers and status markers are perceptions about ourselves and others that define how we see ourselves and others and what makes us who we are.
In abusive relationships, the abused individual losses internal competency that results in depression, anxiety, suicidal ideations, which may lead to self-destructive behavior patterns. This resulting from long-term abuse of electronic physical assaults and psychotronic torture that leave the targeted subjects less productive than they were before. It then places the targeted subject in a state of debilitating or deteriorated physical condition with feelings of worthlessness, badness (no good), powerlessness, and hopelessness as a result of the targeting. At 53, I should not be identifying with my 88-year-old mother who is debilitated from old age. This is what electronic targeted physical assaults with psychotronic torture accomplishes.
Political operatives with a network of associates directed by their political operatives, with vast amounts of money, to target certain individuals through clandestine investigations to impugn whistle-blowers, journalists, and those seeking to expose government corruption are nothing new to the psychoanalytic theatre stage of deception and seduction. In the book, Dark Money, Jane Mayer spent five years conducting hundreds of interviews-including with several sources within the network-and scoured public records, private papers, and court proceedings in reporting this book. In a taut and utterly convincing narrative, she traces the byzantine trail of the billions of dollars spent by the network and provides vivid portraits of the colorful figures behind the new American oligarchy.
What’s my point? There are over 100,000 American citizens claiming to be the victims of a clandestine targeting operation that gang stalks, eavesdrops, using advanced technology to target and disable them. Who are the ones that will be profiting off of this phenomenon? Investors to the next generation of advancing technologies?
What further compounds the problem? Some of these targeted American citizens come from abusive homes (already with psychiatric issues) and the fact they are being further abused facilitates a narrative that supports the primary political operatives’ goals and agenda. It goes back to what I spoke about at the beginning of this post; killing off identity capital. Part of the identity of the individual is being replaced (behavioral changes). Part of the identity capital of being feminine is most certainly body image, body size, dress size, clothing apparel, dress accessories, youth, and beauty. To attack any one of those identifying characteristics is to commit identity murder or a form of femicide. My psychology is feminine psychology rooted in theories of female development.
My question is this. How are targeted subjects who come from abusive family homes supposed to transcend their abuse in recovery if the abuse is compounded by continued electronic/psychotronic targeted violence? The answer to that question is: It is the political operative who has deemed the targeted subjects as an “unvaluable group” deserving of experimental research and development for profit against a marginalized group of individuals whose lives “don’t really matter.”
Jane Mayer. (2016). “Dark Money: The hidden history of the billionaires behind the rise of the radical right.” New York. Anchor Books: A Division of Random House, LLC.
Blizard, Ruth & Bluhm, Ann. (1994). Attachment to the abuser: Integrating object-relations and trauma theories in treatment of abuse survivors. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 31. 383–390. 10.1037/0033–318.104.22.1683.
“Therefore, nothing can be neglected with respect to the infinite presence in the world. There are no poetic objects as opposed to others that are not. Genuine purity has nothing to do with the choice of objects and of means: it is that which courageously faces up to the harshnesses and the impurities of the world, and returns to the light of day having lost nothing of its whiteness. The poet has a right to all worlds: his only sin would be a lack of love for some fragment of the universe.” ~Jean Rousselot, ‘L’Evangile selon Rainer Maria Rilke’, in Les Lettres Nouvelles, 1952
Sublimation is required for the manifestation of the perverse creative process. Enigmatic is the relationship between creation and perversion the two are intertwined on a basic level. The same instinctual energy that is released through perverse sexual activity is now sublimated and re-directed through the perverse creative process. Pregenital libido is released with pregenital instincts which are essential as the raw materials to this sublimation process.
This basic psychoanalytic information given to us by Janine Chasseguet-Smirgel in Creativity and Perversion is the information that helps us uncover the Truth surrounding Falsehood. For me, it was to uncover Truthbehind the sexual perversion of homosexuality. The psychoanalytic compulsion to idealize certain aspects of the Self is a vital need for the maintenance of self-esteem in structural theory. Janine Chasseguet-Smirgel uses the term “pervert” to describe the person who wishes to distort, warp, contort, abuse, misrepresent, and corrupt reality. I find the term “pervert” demeaning and derogatory simply because we are all potential “perverts” waiting on the right set of environmental cues to manifest. What is required is an astute mind to evaluate what is “true” against what is “false.” Uncovering Truth is not always an easy thing to do but becoming closely acquainted with Falsehood, in man’s social game of thrones, is a crucial skill to learn for any individual.
First, Falsehood develops out of a poverty for the pregenital ego to maintain an appropriate amount of self-esteem in early childhood development. In fact, it could be said a lot of perversions develop out of an impoverishment both socially, financially, AND individually.
I am going to speak on my own personal observations in a family drama that has unfolded recently, and ones that are probably not too unfamiliar with people in positions of power and leadership. It is also one of the popular areas that surround a subtle, yet lethal, type of Falsehood and it is in the act of charitable contributions associated with what Jacques Lacan wrote in the following quote:
“The images of man’s body is the principle of every unity he perceives in objects . . . all the objects of his world are always structured around the wondering shadows of his own ego.”
In the movie “The Girl with The Dragon Tattoo” Martin Vanger, the killer, posed a question to Mikael Blomkvist right before his unsuccessful attempt to murder him, “Why human beings don’t run at the slightest feeling of danger?” To which he provides the answer he believes to be the reason. It’s because humans are trained in early childhood development not to offend others and that “to be polite” is more important than pain or being uncomfortable whether it be psychological pain or physical pain. As a result, they are unwittingly trained to self-doubt their own instincts. This is something that doesn’t happen in the wild. Animals, at the slightest perception of danger, run. This makes them excellent barometers for cataclysmic events like earthquakes, tsunamis, and volcanic eruptions.
Regarding my own personal analysis in my personal perspective on conflict and violence; to give anything, gifts, services, or charitable donations is a way people “win sales” in game theory. Psychopaths are very astute at social games and sociopaths are very astute at learning how to get what they need. It is for this reason, psychopaths learn early on that charity can be wielded and taken away with abusive power as it could also be used to manipulate a victim, and, at the same time, used as a character witness to deceive onlookers in the crowd. It is for this reason not only sociopaths, but innocent victims, who are impoverished, and at a disadvantage, may become ensnared in the barbed coil of psychopathic social games played by the charitable psychopath. It’s a game played out over and over again in rings of power and leadership. It’s the smoke and mirrors of the illusionist making things disappear and reappear when warped and distorted minds begin playing their elusive games.
It is at this point I would like to re-introduce Chassegeut-Smirgel’s first research entitle ‘The Emperor of China’s Nightingale — A Psychoanalytical Essay on Falsehood’ (1968) in why the creation of aestheticism is so important to self-esteem and to Falsehood. In this research paper, Chassegeut-Smirgel introduces the Hans Christian Andersen story ‘The Nightingale.’ I give a very brief account of the story. Beyond the limits of the Emperor of China’s garden was a lovely forest where, in the branches, lived a nightingale whose exquisite singing enchanted poor fisherman. The nightingale soon became famous as one of the best of all the Emperor’s wonders. The Emperor, wanting to possess the bird, requested it be bought to him so he could cage it and listen to it sing. A little girl brought the lord-in-waiting to the nightingale, but he was disappointed to see a little grey bird that looked, well, rather ordinary. But its song brought tears to the Emperor’s eyes and determined to possess this exquisite bird, had it caged and brought to court. The Emperor then received a package and inside was a casket that contained a mechanical nightingale supposed to look like a living one, but it was covered all over with diamonds, rubies, and sapphires. As soon as the artificial bird had been wound up, it could sing like the real one and could move its tail, which sparkled with silver and gold, which moved up and down. It was a present from the Emperor of Japan to the Emperor of China. Very soon after its arrival, the whole court enthused over the mechanical nightingale, which was so beautiful to behold and which could sing thirty times over the same tune at a tempo the real nightingale could not sustain. No one noticed when the real nightingale flew out the window, back to its green woods.
Can we make the connection between the reality of our current political events and the difference bound in Falsehood and Truth?
In this area of psychoanalysis to which I have drawn you, many times the question can become less a legal question of “who is right” and “who is wrong,” and more a question of morality as opposed to the Law. As you know, there are no laws making morality a legal requirement to live in civilized society. The entire cliche, “I cannot tell a lie,” is used to train the very young to be honest. It becomes more and more a philosophical question of “What grounds the claims that Falsehood is wrong and that the interdiction against Falsehood should be a label of ‘outcast’?” These prohibitions can become absolute prohibitions that cast all forms of Falsehood in the arena of “outside Other” in some cultures. It becomes bound to philosophical questions like, “Who is deserving of the right to live?” and “Who is deserving of the right to die?” These questions are both metaphorical and literal at times in the pursuit of philosophy. “Whose lives are more valuable? Whose lives can be left to die?” It’s the root of all conflict and violence in the Us vs Them, sometimes petty litigations of the adversarial court of “The Satan,” or at least those we label as “The Satan.” Those characters we deem as Luciferian Other and those characters we deem as “Godly Other.” In reality, it is just like Ru Paul said, “We are all born naked. The rest is drag.”
I have chosen to write this post because I was inspired by personal family events and my awareness of the psychoanalytic truths that are bound to these events.
Chassegeut-Smirgel, Janine. (1984). Creativity and Perversions. London. Free Association Books. (pg.89)
Lacan, Jacques. (1991). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book II. New York. W.W. Norton. (pg. 166). Originally written in French ‘Le Seminaire, Livre II.’ 1978. Paris. Seuil. (pg. 198).
I find myself questioning society’s notion of “civilized living.” That is, questioning society’s idea of “honor” when men use very individual and varying forms of “protection” in protecting their interests. Every day people can be corrupt like the denizens of industry; businessmen and politicians. People who manipulate many variables in their pursuit of protecting profits and interests, while violating the personal boundaries of others. The bottom lines are always profit, sales, and personal interests. It’s a social game of thrones.
In comparing The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn to The Red Badge of Courage I find similarities in my own personal experience with Electronic Targeted Physical Assaults and Psychotronic Torture as a Gang Stalked and Targeted Individual. Similarities in comparing the two novels and the experiences of the Targeted Individual:
•The main characters have to explore the notion of “civilized living” in the societies where they exist. That is to say, they have to question society’s notion of what is “honorable.”
•Each main character has to question the behavior of his male role models and his male peers. (Except for me, I find myself questioning both female and male role models as well as female and male peers). Something that is decidedly different when comparing the above two novels because they were about men, and not women.
•Each main character encounters challenges.
•Each main character witnesses behavior that makes them question their role models. (Of course, this would implicitly suggest that the purpose for my targeting is that I am a “child” who needs to “grow up.”)
•Each main character question their former beliefs.
I suppose “coming of age” as a male is decidedly different than coming of age as a female. Is it not? And the answer to that question I suppose should be, “It depends.”It depends on the culture in which you live. Personally, as a woman, I have been used as a receptacle (vehicle) for sexual pleasure as well as physical violence. I have been made the canvas with which one gets to dispel their anger, hate, violence, and frustration on to. Used for a purpose, I often wonder what it’s like for men? Of course, the answer to that question would be, “It depends on which culture you live in.” I sometimes feel it’s the greedy, cold-hearted who fair the best in this “system of civilized honor” that depends on one’s skill in the social game of thrones. That to possess an element of sadism is to possess a piece of success I suppose. As a Targeted Individual, I am dealing with an intelligent operator who is networked and belongs to a certain “culture.” That is to say, the past incarcerated type of culture.
It’s funny to discuss such notions of “coming of age in civil society”when many have not made it to the “coming of age” benchmark. People who are still rooted in their destructive infantile narcissism. I remember in 7th grade wondering about what it would be like upon my “coming of age” as a young married adult female when I would experience a challenge by something on the outside in young adulthood. Who could have predicted my detour? The people who were influencing me at the time; other lost peers and the uneducated. And shouldn’t my eating disorder have been an indexical sign that something was seriously wrong? My parents didn’t have money for proper health care, I, therefore, did not receive treatment and even the pediatrician said “Just let it be. It’s just a phase she’s going through.” I never got routine blood tests. My mother couldn’t afford to pay the fee unless I was sick with fever and unless the doctor said it was necessary the test would not get performed. And now, at the mature age of 53, they want to “fix me” of my so-called “ill” with electronic targeted assaults? When it’s more like fix me of my so-called “ilk” so someone else doesn’t get inconvenienced by my presence. It appears some masked veiled person(s) in society are screaming, “Get fixed girl! You’re broken.” And I’m telling them, “Go fuck yourself asshole! Because you are violating my basic civil rights!” It’s the smoke and mirrors of an illusionist playing an illusionist’s game. A veiled operator behind the curtain making the car levitate on fish wire and pulleys.
I have often asked myself where were the loving parents who failed this veiled impoverished predator? What happens to the children who are unwanted? When people get cast aside, what happens to their psyches? Did I reject this operator at some point in my past? When parents can’t afford their children, don’t they grow up on a type of “Offal Court” down on “Pudding Lane” like in the Prince and the Pauper? Romy Reiner tweeted she wanted to find a husband who looked at her like her parents did. Not me. My parents wanted to abort me. How do you think the Pauper’s parents, the character Tom Canty, looked at him? To find a husband who shares that sentiment is like a death wish. When the love I needed the most failed, why would I want a husband like that? Or maybe, it is like Shakespeare said, that is the rub. We can never find that “holy” love because we are all just hell-bound lovers perpetually bound in leather and chains to our past ambivalence. When will that next thorn pierce us?
Someone posted a question over Quora.com. They asked if it would be unethical to arrest someone before they committed a crime, even as a baby if the authorities had prior knowledge of future wrong-doing like in Minority Report? If you have knowledge of specific probable outcomes in children, why not offer interventions instead of full-on castration of the subject through incarceration? The question baffles me.
And why is saying poor so much more unpalatable than saying, “I have no money?” Because to be poor might also mean destitution. It might mean an absolute poverty, the type of poverty where a person has not even friends or relatives who care. To say, “I have no money” means temporarily broke and that might mean you will be getting more money soon, and so, are not really destitute or “poor.” Just poor in the moment.
Yesterday, August 6, 2021, I was targeted again with electronic physical assault and psychotronic torture. They used electronics that sedate me at the operator’s will as they used on me in Captial Health Systems at Fuld in their psychiatric holding area but why? I slept in my home for quite a few hours today as a result. My body is being managed by an unknown perpetrator that is violating my 4th amendment rights. The connection to this phenomenon IS with the mental healthcare system which is violating my rights. The connection is this. Yesterday I receive a reminder phone call that I had an appointment with a psychiatrist today (Saturday, August 7, 2021). An appointment at Oaks Integrated for “aftercare” follow-up on a Saturday? They don’t have appointments on Saturday. But yet there is the connection to being electronically targeted in the privacy of my own home and my appointments with behavioral health. I was attacked yesterday because of someone’s sick game. Someone is using electronic targeted assault as a form of punishment against me. This would be consistent with a research sample percentage of people claiming they are being targeted so as to get them to attend meet-up groups or meet with psychiatrists to receive treatment and additional federal funding. To make them think “They’re crazy” and be awarded disability benefits.The same research paper reports that 42% of the respondents suffered some type of psychological damage with 26% reporting a lifestyle change. The content narratives were gleaned from internet-based searches for websites, blogs, and forums data mining terms like “gang stalking,”“group stalking,”“gang stalking stories,” and “victims of gang stalking,” “targeted individuals,” and “TI.”
Sheridan, L., James, D., & Roth, J. (2020). The Phenomenology of Group Stalking (‘Gang-Stalking’): A Content Analysis of Subjective Experiences. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7),